linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@gmail.com>, linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ricarkol@google.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v11 10/13] um: nommu: a work around for MMU dependency to PCI driver
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:30:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a58620ecefa207e141a435c36492647c3d5bd3df.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a9dde10c586883d20a8201ca7d76e6d7d52eaf4.1758181109.git.thehajime@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 16:39 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> The commit 8fe743b5eba0 ("PCI: Add CONFIG_MMU dependency") restricts the
> PCI base driver to depend on MMU.  While nommu UML _can_ implement PCI
> drivers over PCI devices (e.g., virtio-pci), the current nommu UML
> doesn't implement it.
> 
> But without PCI drivers kunit complains as config for kunit
> (arch_uml.config) defines the dependency to PCI drivers.
> 
> This commit fixes the issue of this compile failures when building PCI
> drivers with nommu UML.  In particular, the fix is to undefine the
> constant PCI_IOBASE to be able to bypass pci_unmap_iospace() call.

This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Why would we even want to build
PCI on NOMMU-UML if PCI in general is dependent on MMU now?

It's not like ARCH=um with PCI and NOMMU has any value even for testing
if such a configuration cannot exist in reality?

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18  7:38 [PATCH RESEND v11 00/13] nommu UML Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 01/13] x86/um: nommu: elf loader for fdpic Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 02/13] um: decouple MMU specific code from the common part Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 03/13] um: nommu: memory handling Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 04/13] x86/um: nommu: syscall handling Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 05/13] um: nommu: seccomp syscalls hook Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 06/13] x86/um: nommu: process/thread handling Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 07/13] um: nommu: configure fs register on host syscall invocation Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 08/13] x86/um/vdso: nommu: vdso memory update Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 09/13] x86/um: nommu: signal handling Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 10/13] um: nommu: a work around for MMU dependency to PCI driver Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  8:30   ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2025-09-19  0:03     ` Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-19  7:24       ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-19  9:32         ` Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-19  9:38           ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-19  9:38             ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-19  9:43             ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-19 23:46             ` Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-22  6:32               ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-23 23:44                 ` Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-23 15:42           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-23 17:13             ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-23 23:51               ` Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-24  8:02                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-24 11:03                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-24 23:27                   ` Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 11/13] um: change machine name for uname output Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 12/13] um: nommu: add documentation of nommu UML Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18  7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 13/13] um: nommu: plug nommu code into build system Hajime Tazaki
2025-09-18 10:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v11 00/13] nommu UML Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a58620ecefa207e141a435c36492647c3d5bd3df.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=thehajime@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).