From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D6ACA5FA6 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:23:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=dNDAcGHNy09VRA5c5vXMv5G1dwyTJJ5okykDl+SczM8=; b=GLJ2K7yHq2LuyG+mfuBhosdIiA Upd5+hJgOVCKNZf1j9erPh3mnQQfcGQoouY/G0jHpnQLoNXYWoBLYnbfSUBenUliSqQgmmeYeKgyV iFL8tjcQxGNlcwN4zb35Fzbnx+vizlyzkIkihzEjfHdXdKLEyLMEA6lkADk6ItHQ3lcmMkG8srznm RY9mqDB3qKhGshVoHLot+scELorvAfd75jqgqGYA14wmRGcBxY2p10+GHySjtozyEFYJ+gl22UDUJ 5gq3nTWf+ZBhTuk6GFyamtEhvfLWRfrwxp3Hv1KGD8XXEkCosGLkc5q9bTFymNzMoAVaej4Y5rY2N yC+qopRg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBE8M-00000001131-1vYa; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:23:18 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBE8L-0000000111q-2IPZ for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:23:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3A9601EF; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54C8B1F0089A; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790612596; bh=dNDAcGHNy09VRA5c5vXMv5G1dwyTJJ5okykDl+SczM8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=AdKe3PuzxBeIfMRzAElN7KJNlKqTeYxTv3RiLkw/Qz7zSVjL8rh3hz+brQG9Rl0bw 4FC4Y6iUVl8feOfDgHg3UMd8MhU6S6JawTo5suISocRvxaMFCN044OBdhh8q4QSPzm +84ocNwkhgBfQ1aDLsOl181/6k8blbWN99FN7JDQx3AGzlJNTzWmITGFdRp4WIzIu4 jYZICQBD3DbSAThjkRuJHvNzQorEuRquCsQq8bHfEy+9Eo49vSzkuMj34fUFRYF0ow SlysURxuHxAAvgD/PtsHtPh4xlw2nSGiLzbixrt35t5zyhNs9HZSuzvytQul8CXo5P asQRSILi8GvMg== Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:23:08 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Johannes Berg Cc: Hajime Tazaki , linux-mm@kvack.org, liam@infradead.org, rbm@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@amacapital.net, brendan.jackman@linux.dev, david@kernel.org, liuhangbin@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, kees@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, rppt@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, daniel@thingy.jp Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] selftests: run tests on nommu architecture Message-ID: References: <20260926010819.604346-1-thehajime@gmail.com> <20260926010819.604346-3-thehajime@gmail.com> <04259a99ed91f8a527b255951a6f626310728170.camel@sipsolutions.net> <8dfc0ec9ed660e373451c96b6fcc352c35a6a004.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8dfc0ec9ed660e373451c96b6fcc352c35a6a004.camel@sipsolutions.net> X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 02:32:50PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2026-09-28 at 12:00 +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > > Not sure where this should be merged? I guess selftests would make most > > > sense, but you can't actually test it out before the UML nommu changes, > > > so that doesn't work too well right now? > > > > I seem to recall Hajime saying he tested this on an actual nommu > > device/virtualised equivalent so nommu UML isn't strictly necessary (though very > > nice to have!) > > Oh, I don't recall, but I guess that's plausibe. > > > I think I saw something fly by that implied it might be coming in 7.4 is that > > so? :) > > I did end up merging just about everything that was pending for > uml/next, so if we don't forget to send a pull request in the merge > window, or something equally catastrophic happens, yes ;-) Awesome, thanks! :) > > Sorry for the delay. The onslaught of LLMs means priority is elsewhere, > sadly. Yeah understood, onslaught has reached all areas of the kernel it seems... > > johannes -- Cheers, Lorenzo