From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05CBECFD364 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 07:40:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From :Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NHne8B71rhlo4JDZkWGouJWY6gpQg/ock03JEjHdivU=; b=GkzKbIrZHt+Z3oyOp43A1tzE6w jd9SpRccsSMGvtwGCnYLJSiP405hw00OZaxt6w8esczBug1gNDrptbc3NKXzE+0fAbEW0U/Mecklb 33nyEwUVOfFklVUbP8OQe2GI42uLiMhDEy32rxeXs1E3uzyX6O5oIW3y1snBvmsiro02WIXyTkBsE mGZojoqO7cX5xnlJXAJqYlJbdMSQpeMx4icrx3eyTbHFsZL2wfSpT8AJB+Y5/nbhWmZW//DNy1Zj3 1L5gzOldk9YoTyD8dmAEXxq+2IMzEBO5b+35VHSJB7tCkvJ9QZI3slxNs1qIlLq5Gpuhgrw0/7z2B HDqREwfg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vNnex-0000000CuSd-0hMD; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 07:40:23 +0000 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([2a01:4f8:242:246e::2] helo=sipsolutions.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vNnev-0000000CuRn-07q0 for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 07:40:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=NHne8B71rhlo4JDZkWGouJWY6gpQg/ock03JEjHdivU=; t=1764056420; x=1765266020; b=l67L1gWk/1tq+835IUqJxWPb07TdK77H9hDiBAQhrgqojyG QQV0Uk/NtkGBe3rZofD1XetARaFFhKSXAsFro11GpAEJShsAoRd/bdtu1jyO75ZctzKG84BBwA37q rcGLQAlwoNQkctc3p+H8ZdDrIpqseDKCXhfO0wgzrRZMMp245huYRjgBXGMMyRb8wE6HvM+v8+M4a ob6d2HYN2B/qdPScvpXtgbFMzY6tduZHnK0odsSsHztnAy3bBXsuUDsG9NXXTDD7CgcH+zY6YGUZt BAMBnaIDKEV1+YDS/G4mwLzC+1jlbOxJz+73opAst8W0PNEGDsNV7uWBiQTW0Teg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vNneq-0000000BNRi-1osg; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:40:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: um: Don't rename vmap to kernel_vmap From: Johannes Berg To: David Gow Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Miguel Ojeda , Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso , Alice Ryhl , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:40:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20251125_083645_823712_C74034DC) References: <20251122083213.3996586-1-davidgow@google.com> (sfid-20251125_083645_823712_C74034DC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-2.fc42) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251124_234021_101973_104D522A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2025-11-25 at 15:36 +0800, David Gow wrote: > >=20 > > Or it's not that urgent because all this came up in -next now? I didn't > > really see (or fully understand) all the build bug reports. > >=20 >=20 > I'm happy for this to go in via any tree. (Worst-case, we could > possibly take it via KUnit, though I'd rather not, as it's not really > KUnit-related at all.) >=20 > The issue has actually been around since probably 6.16 (c284d3e42338 > ("rust: drm: gem: Add GEM object abstraction")), but since it only > applies to people building Rust graphics drivers against UML, which is > not super common, it seems like it's only come up in randconfig builds > so far. Oh, interesting, OK. I guess then given that it's not super important and how late we're in the game, I'll just throw it into the (relatively small) pile we have for UML for -next. Given that we removed the pcap driver in 6.11 (12b8e7e69aa7a) I guess we could even ask stable to take it, but it's not even that important until someone wants to test the rust DRM stuff in kunit or something :) johannes