From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([2a01:4f8:191:4433::2] helo=sipsolutions.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lLTwj-00EMOm-Fl for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 16:50:31 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v8 07/20] um: lkl: host interface From: Johannes Berg Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:50:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Hajime Tazaki , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com Cc: tavi.purdila@gmail.com, linux-kernel-library@freelists.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, retrage01@gmail.com > +/** > + * struct lkl_host_operations - host operations used by the Linux kernel > + * > + * These operations must be provided by a host library or by the application > + * itself. > + * > + */ > +struct lkl_host_operations { > +}; IIRC, in previous reviews we discussed this and you said you'd look at just making those extern functions, instead of function pointers, since realistically there's no use in being able to switch these at runtime. What happened to that? Any particular reason not to? johannes _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um