linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tiwei Bie" <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: Turn HAS_IOPORT_MAP off
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 23:02:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc4e51e0-4ffc-42f0-a400-3d889ca749eb@antgroup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49982e79-957d-401b-882c-849d2892bf4c@app.fastmail.com>

On 2025/7/2 21:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025, at 15:02, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>> On 2025/7/2 19:09, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2025, at 14:22, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>>> xtensa selects NO_IOPORT_MAP, which means that HAS_IOPORT_MAP
>>> gets disabled here:
>>>
>>> arch/xtensa/Kconfig:config NO_IOPORT_MAP
>>> arch/xtensa/Kconfig-    def_bool n
>>
>> The value of NO_IOPORT_MAP on xtensa is inverted compared to that
>> on most other platforms that explicitly defines NO_IOPORT_MAP.
> 
> Ah of course, sorry for misunderstanding. Apparently this only
> existed because it was selected by a long gone platform:
> 
> -config XTENSA_PLATFORM_S6105
> -       bool "S6105"
> -       select HAVE_IDE
> -       select SERIAL_CONSOLE
> -       select NO_IOPORT_MAP

Cool, that makes sense!

> 
> Before commits
> 
> d38efc1f150f ("xtensa: adopt generic io routines")
> d046f77ec4a4 ("xtensa: set NO_IOPORT to 'n' by default")
> 
> it was always-on, and I think the idea at the time was to
> make it behave more like the generic PCI code, while it
> was originally copied from sparc, which does things quite
> differently.
> 
> It is rather clear that the I/O port implementation on
> xtensa never actually worked, and some of the comments
> on its PCI code suggest that it was never really used
> either.

Thanks for the details. I'm not really familiar with xtensa;
my understanding comes merely from reading the code. Please
feel free to proceed with your patch. I also think it is a
more generic solution. :)

Regards,
Tiwei



      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-02 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-28 16:47 [PATCH] um: Turn HAS_IOPORT_MAP off Tiwei Bie
2025-07-01  8:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-07-01  8:43   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-07-01 12:22     ` Tiwei Bie
2025-07-02 11:09       ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-07-02 13:02         ` Tiwei Bie
2025-07-02 13:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-07-02 15:02             ` Tiwei Bie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc4e51e0-4ffc-42f0-a400-3d889ca749eb@antgroup.com \
    --to=tiwei.btw@antgroup.com \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).