public inbox for linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>
To: "amir73il@gmail.com" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"eddiehorng.tw@gmail.com" <eddiehorng.tw@gmail.com>
Cc: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"miklos@szeredi.hu" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jlayton@kernel.org" <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: readdir returns d_type=DT_UNKNOWN to overlay exported dir (NFSv3)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:22:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521120161.86246.4.camel@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxi1qFM5UguMswnAWWCGNVwzNYMr_rJtN=+Bt9tUhhPFuA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 15:13 +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Eddie Horng <eddiehorng.tw@gmail.co
> m> wrote:
> > I tried to track the difference between overlay-NFSv3 and ext4-
> > NFSv3
> > of encode_post_op_attr.
> > mount configuration:
> > none /share overlay
> > rw,relatime,lowerdir=/base/lower,upperdir=/base/upper,workdir=/base
> > /work,index=on,nfs_export=on
> > 0 0
> > localhost:/share /mnt/n nfs
> > rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,prot
> > o=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=127.0.0.1,mountvers=3,m
> > ountport=40931,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=127.0.0.1
> > 0 0
> > /dev/loop0 /share2 ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
> > localhost:/share2 /mnt/n2 nfs
> > rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,prot
> > o=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=127.0.0.1,mountvers=3,m
> > ountport=40931,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=127.0.0.1
> > 0 0
> > 
> > file tree:
> > /mnt/n
> > > -- dirA
> > >   `-- bar
> > > -- dirL
> > >   `-- ro-file
> > 
> > `-- foo
> > 
> > /mnt/n2
> > `-- lost+found
> > 
> > Attached log are dmesg start from "readdir /mnt/n (n2)" with nfs
> > and
> > nfsd log are enabled all by sunrpc.nfs(d)_debug. I also add a
> > dump_stack() in the beginning of encode_post_op_attr.
> > 
> > It seems overlay and ext4 have different call flow after "nfsd:
> > READDIR+", there is no failure in overlay's encode_post_op_attr,
> > nfsd
> > does fill the attrs, same as ext4 but it has additional readdir
> > call
> > to child node of "/". I'm not sure if this is normal to overlay and
> > is
> > the cause of DT_UNKNOWN.
> 
> I tried to follow nfsd readdir code to see where the difference can
> come
> from, but nothing poped at me so far.
> 
> > 
> > In additional, overlay returns DT_UNKNOWN to either lower dir or
> > merged dir.
> 
> Your test is readdir of a merged dir, the behavior could differ when
> readdir of
> an overlayfs non merged dir.
> 
> Please send the output and dmesg of readdir of the non-merged lower
> dir:
> 
> /readdir/a.out /mnt/n/dirL
> 
> Please mount an NFS share of /base and send the output of the same
> dir:
> 
> /readdir/a.out /mnt/n_base/lower/n/dirL
> 
> Right now I speculate that the issue you report is related to
> how merged dirs are iterated, but not sure exactly why.

fs/nfsd has nothing to do with ${SUBJECT}.

If you want to trace where the DT_UNKNOWN is coming from, then you need
to look at the _client_ code in fs/nfs/nfs3xdr.c:nfs3_decode_dirent(). 

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@primarydata.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-15 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-14  8:42 readdir returns d_type=DT_UNKNOWN to overlay exported dir (NFSv3) Eddie Horng
2018-03-14  9:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-14 11:02 ` Jeff Layton
2018-03-14 14:16   ` Trond Myklebust
2018-03-14 14:30     ` Jeff Layton
2018-03-14 15:03       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-14 15:06         ` Trond Myklebust
2018-03-14 15:14           ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-14 15:40             ` Eddie Horng
2018-03-15  9:23               ` Eddie Horng
2018-03-15  9:47 ` Eddie Horng
2018-03-15 13:13   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-15 13:22     ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2018-03-15 14:30       ` Eddie Horng
2018-03-15 18:40         ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-15 21:48           ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-16  6:25             ` Eddie Horng
2018-03-16  7:23               ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-16  8:06                 ` Eddie Horng
2018-03-16  9:50                   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-16 15:06                     ` Eddie Horng
2018-03-16 15:28                       ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1521120161.86246.4.camel@primarydata.com \
    --to=trondmy@primarydata.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=eddiehorng.tw@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox