From: "NeilBrown" <neil@brown.name>
To: "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_workdir_create()
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:08:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175245528976.2234665.7568103453340576012@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjwgoPAmu7M+6+-McrvnrUjYQ4eK6ZWZcLnn5RS+seArQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 1:21 AM NeilBrown <neil@brown.name> wrote:
> >
> > In ovl_workdir_create() don't hold the dir lock for the whole time, but
> > only take it when needed.
> >
> > It now gets taken separately for ovl_workdir_cleanup(). A subsequent
> > patch will move the locking into that function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
> > ---
> > fs/overlayfs/super.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > index 9cce3251dd83..239ae1946edf 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > @@ -299,8 +299,8 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_workdir_create(struct ovl_fs *ofs,
> > int err;
> > bool retried = false;
> >
> > - inode_lock_nested(dir, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> > retry:
> > + inode_lock_nested(dir, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> > work = ovl_lookup_upper(ofs, name, ofs->workbasedir, strlen(name));
> >
> > if (!IS_ERR(work)) {
> > @@ -311,23 +311,27 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_workdir_create(struct ovl_fs *ofs,
> >
> > if (work->d_inode) {
> > err = -EEXIST;
> > + inode_unlock(dir);
> > if (retried)
> > goto out_dput;
> >
> > if (persist)
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > + goto out;
> >
> > retried = true;
> > + inode_lock_nested(dir, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
>
> Feels like this should be parent_lock(ofs->workbasedir, work)
> and parent_lock(ofs->workbasedir, NULL) in retry:
Agreed.
>
> > err = ovl_workdir_cleanup(ofs, dir, mnt, work, 0);
> > + inode_unlock(dir);
> > dput(work);
> > if (err == -EINVAL) {
> > work = ERR_PTR(err);
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> > goto retry;
> > }
> >
> > work = ovl_do_mkdir(ofs, dir, work, attr.ia_mode);
> > + inode_unlock(dir);
> > err = PTR_ERR(work);
> > if (IS_ERR(work))
> > goto out_err;
> > @@ -365,11 +369,11 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_workdir_create(struct ovl_fs *ofs,
> > if (err)
> > goto out_dput;
> > } else {
> > + inode_unlock(dir);
> > err = PTR_ERR(work);
> > goto out_err;
> > }
> > -out_unlock:
> > - inode_unlock(dir);
> > +out:
> > return work;
> >
> > out_dput:
> > @@ -378,7 +382,7 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_workdir_create(struct ovl_fs *ofs,
> > pr_warn("failed to create directory %s/%s (errno: %i); mounting read-only\n",
> > ofs->config.workdir, name, -err);
> > work = NULL;
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > + goto out;
>
> might as well be return NULL now.
Done. I got rid of the out: label completely.
NeilBrown
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 23:03 [PATCH 00/20 v2] ovl: narrow regions protected by i_rw_sem NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 01/20] ovl: simplify an error path in ovl_copy_up_workdir() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 8:25 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-11 10:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 0:13 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-14 5:42 ` parent_lock/unlock (Was: [PATCH 01/20] ovl: simplify an error path in ovl_copy_up_workdir()) Amir Goldstein
2025-07-16 3:55 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 02/20] ovl: change ovl_create_index() to take write and dir locks NeilBrown
2025-07-11 10:41 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 0:14 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 03/20] ovl: Call ovl_create_temp() without lock held NeilBrown
2025-07-11 11:10 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 04/20] ovl: narrow the locked region in ovl_copy_up_workdir() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 12:03 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 0:29 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 05/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_create_upper() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 12:09 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 06/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_clear_empty() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 12:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 07/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_create_over_whiteout() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 12:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 08/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_rename() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:03 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 1:00 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-14 5:12 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 09/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_cleanup_whiteouts() NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 10/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_cleanup_index() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:12 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 1:03 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 11/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_workdir_create() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:32 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 1:08 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 12/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_indexdir_cleanup() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 13/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_workdir_cleanup_recurse() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 14/20] ovl: change ovl_workdir_cleanup() to take dir lock as needed NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 15/20] ovl: narrow locking on ovl_remove_and_whiteout() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 1:35 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 16/20] ovl: change ovl_cleanup_and_whiteout() to take rename lock as needed NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 17/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_whiteout() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 15:19 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 1:44 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 18/20] ovl: narrow locking in ovl_check_rename_whiteout() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 13:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 19/20] ovl: change ovl_create_real() to receive dentry parent NeilBrown
2025-07-10 23:03 ` [PATCH 20/20] ovl: rename ovl_cleanup_unlocked() to ovl_cleanup() NeilBrown
2025-07-11 9:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-11 16:41 ` [PATCH 00/20 v2] ovl: narrow regions protected by i_rw_sem Amir Goldstein
2025-07-14 5:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-07-16 0:13 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175245528976.2234665.7568103453340576012@noble.neil.brown.name \
--to=neil@brown.name \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).