From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] fscrypt: d_revalidate fixes and cleanups Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 10:22:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1872467.qaoHDzFeKg@blindfold> References: <20190320183913.12686-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20190401171119.GC131675@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190401171119.GC131675@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Eric Biggers Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Sarthak Kukreti , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 1. April 2019, 19:11:21 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers: > Any more comments on these patches? I'd like to apply them to the fscrypt tree > for 5.2. Richard, can you check whether these solve your overlayfs use case? > Also, patch 5 could use Acks from ext4, f2fs, and ubifs people. Will check this week, traveling right now. Thanks, //richard