linux-unionfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] overlay: use default overlay mount options _overlay_mount_dirs()
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:08:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012060808.GZ10593@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170927080549.GM8034@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:05:49PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:50:46AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Tests that use _overlay_mount_dirs() should also use the
> > > default overlay mount options.
> > 
> > Vivek, Eryu,
> > 
> > I should make a disclaimer here: I did not test with SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS
> > because I have no SELinux in my test setup.
> > 
> > Specifically, I am concerned that tests that compose "special" overlay mounts,
> > like tmpfs mounts and stacked overlay mounts (overlay/029) may not play well
> > with SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS applied to the special mounts.
> > I am less concerned about the tests that were converted to use
> > _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs() helper.
> > 
> > Can either of you run a -g overlay/quick test with this series and valid
> > SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS?
> 
> Sure, I'll do the testings anyway, and I have selinux enabled on my test
> vms.

I just finished a '-g auto' run with OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o index=on"
and selinux enabled, and the results look fine, all failures are known
issues. Thanks for the work!

Eryu

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-27  7:04 [PATCH 0/4] fstests: fixes for config option OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27  7:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] overlay: remove stale implementation of _scratch_mount_options Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27  7:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] overlay: use default overlay mount options _overlay_mount_dirs() Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27  7:50   ` Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27  8:05     ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-12  6:08       ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-10-11 11:33   ` Eryu Guan
2017-09-27  7:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] overlay: create helper _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs() Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27  7:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] overlay: fix _overlay_config_override of MOUNT_OPTIONS Amir Goldstein
2017-10-11 11:50   ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-11 12:35     ` Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27 10:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] overlay: move _overlay helpers to common/overlay Amir Goldstein
2017-09-28 11:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] overlay: deduplicate code in overlay mount helpers Amir Goldstein
2017-09-29  1:44   ` Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171012060808.GZ10593@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).