From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:06:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180928130621.28932-1-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
Cyril,
The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
conditions, but not functionality. The functionality of the advice
POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical to readahead(), so I decided not
to duplicate the readahead functional test and add test cases to
readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
Before I decided not to write new posix_fadvise() tests I converted
the existing tests to newlib. That is available for you as github PR:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/401
Thanks,
Amir.
Amir Goldstein (4):
syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
.../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c | 119 ++-----
.../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c | 332 +++++++++---------
2 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 260 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-28 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-28 13:06 Amir Goldstein [this message]
2018-09-28 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib Amir Goldstein
2018-09-28 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 12:47 ` [LTP] " Jan Stancek
2018-10-03 13:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 16:17 ` Jan Stancek
2018-10-04 6:15 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-09-28 13:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 12:48 ` [LTP] " Jan Stancek
2018-10-03 13:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-09-28 13:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise() Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 12:48 ` [LTP] " Jan Stancek
2018-10-03 13:37 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180928130621.28932-1-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).