From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Misc. redirect_dir=nofollow fixes
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:07:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714180705.GE324688@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200713141945.11719-1-amir73il@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 05:19:42PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Miklos, Vivek,
>
> Following discussion on following an unsafe non-dir origin [1]
> and in a addition to a fix for the reported null uuid case [2] and to
> Vivek's doc clarification [3], I am proposing to piggy back existing
> config redirect_dir=nofollow to also not follow non-dir origin.
>
> Like in the case of non-dir origin, following redirects behavior was
> added with no opt-out option in kernel v4.10. Later security concerns
> about following malformed redirects resulted in the redirect_dir=nofollow
> config option.
So what's the security issue you are seeing with malformed origin? If
it indeed is a security threat, then we should probably introduce
another mount option to disable it (instead of reusing redirect_dir,
because that's so unintuitive, IMHO).
Thanks
Vivek
>
> Without giving too much thought into how unsafe it can be to follow
> a bad origin, there is very low motication IMO to follow non-dir origin
> with redirect_dir=nofollow, because it is a configuration that prefers
> safety over correctness, so it just seems like the right thing to do.
>
> The first two patches are independent bug fixes related to read-only
> NFS export, which can be taken regardless of non-dir origin nofollow.
> FYI, I found those bugs because I am using ro,index=off NFS export
> configuration for the new overlay fsnotify snaphsot series.
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/CAJfpegv9h7ubuGy_6K4OCdZd3R7Z4HGmCDB2L7mO5bVoGd6MSA@mail.gmail.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20200708131613.30038-1-amir73il@gmail.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20200709140220.GC150543@redhat.com/
>
> Amir Goldstein (3):
> ovl: force read-only sb on failure to create index dir
> ovl: fix mount option checks for nfs_export with no upperdir
> ovl: do not follow non-dir origin with redirect_dir=nofollow
>
> Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst | 4 +--
> fs/overlayfs/namei.c | 2 +-
> fs/overlayfs/super.c | 42 ++++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-14 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-13 14:19 [PATCH 0/3] Misc. redirect_dir=nofollow fixes Amir Goldstein
2020-07-13 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] ovl: force read-only sb on failure to create index dir Amir Goldstein
2020-07-14 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-07-14 18:32 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-07-14 18:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-07-14 18:45 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-07-15 20:04 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-16 5:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-07-15 20:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-13 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] ovl: fix mount option checks for nfs_export with no upperdir Amir Goldstein
2020-07-14 14:52 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-14 14:58 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-07-14 15:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-14 15:20 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-07-15 20:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-13 14:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] ovl: do not follow non-dir origin with redirect_dir=nofollow Amir Goldstein
2020-10-30 12:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-10-30 13:20 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-10-30 13:51 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-14 18:07 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-07-14 18:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] Misc. redirect_dir=nofollow fixes Amir Goldstein
2020-07-15 13:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-07-15 13:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-07-16 13:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-07-16 13:43 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-07-16 15:26 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200714180705.GE324688@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox