linux-unionfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 51/58] ovl: check type and offset of struct vfsmount in ovl_entry
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 21:13:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230724011338.2298062-51-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230724011338.2298062-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit f723edb8a532cd26e1ff0a2b271d73762d48f762 ]

Porting overlayfs to the new amount api I started experiencing random
crashes that couldn't be explained easily. So after much debugging and
reasoning it became clear that struct ovl_entry requires the point to
struct vfsmount to be the first member and of type struct vfsmount.

During the port I added a new member at the beginning of struct
ovl_entry which broke all over the place in the form of random crashes
and cache corruptions. While there's a comment in ovl_free_fs() to the
effect of "Hack! Reuse ofs->layers as a vfsmount array before freeing
it" there's no such comment on struct ovl_entry which makes this easy to
trip over.

Add a comment and two static asserts for both the offset and the type of
pointer in struct ovl_entry.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h b/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
index fd11fe6d6d45f..6b9f7917fc1bb 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct ovl_sb {
 };
 
 struct ovl_layer {
+	/* ovl_free_fs() relies on @mnt being the first member! */
 	struct vfsmount *mnt;
 	/* Trap in ovl inode cache */
 	struct inode *trap;
@@ -42,6 +43,14 @@ struct ovl_layer {
 	int fsid;
 };
 
+/*
+ * ovl_free_fs() relies on @mnt being the first member when unmounting
+ * the private mounts created for each layer. Let's check both the
+ * offset and type.
+ */
+static_assert(offsetof(struct ovl_layer, mnt) == 0);
+static_assert(__same_type(typeof_member(struct ovl_layer, mnt), struct vfsmount *));
+
 struct ovl_path {
 	const struct ovl_layer *layer;
 	struct dentry *dentry;
-- 
2.39.2


           reply	other threads:[~2023-07-24  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20230724011338.2298062-1-sashal@kernel.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230724011338.2298062-51-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).