From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C9EEE6420 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 06:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230109AbjIOGv6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 02:51:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41860 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232346AbjIOGv5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 02:51:57 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB802722 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 23:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 306E21F74B; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 06:51:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1694760707; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6d7Aexwx4MHakC44s5oI4XvpxKE+4R880qYFT7U8+nI=; b=D1lpx8QyS9VGuHz5xk0VhOY9UZMuOo5FH3p1OD5+Sp2rOIr1oLdaAaYZ3THLxVYSWsgukB HWAPZNEFliln2m1jAXFi4tPGpEGqXrpVeOeY3/U/ueg6xQOzBv+7DbZPMv7JqpHFQvI/7Y /dWjT9mOXaFVWSmGoIzGOXupuwK5yUc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1694760707; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6d7Aexwx4MHakC44s5oI4XvpxKE+4R880qYFT7U8+nI=; b=ozzcvfkaT9lBnYhsOLHRUj2cfw8gw5RxnQ3l5upFxlRYHgxNAVG+q0ZoNlSxWNjkeWwxlw 4kpupUh5zQrGKvBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D491358A; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 06:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id aeITMgL/A2WcCQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 06:51:46 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 08:51:45 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Amir Goldstein Cc: rpalethorpe@suse.de, Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Miklos Szeredi , linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] fanotify13: Test watching overlayfs upper fs Message-ID: <20230915065145.GA15133@pevik> Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20230903111558.2603332-1-amir73il@gmail.com> <20230903111558.2603332-2-amir73il@gmail.com> <87il8dghw0.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Amir, Richie, > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 1:37 PM Richard Palethorpe wrote: > > Hello Amir, > > Amir Goldstein writes: > > > Run a test variant with overlayfs (over all supported fs) > > > when watching the upper fs. > > > This is a regression test for kernel fix bc2473c90fca > > > ("ovl: enable fsnotify events on underlying real files"), > > > from kernel 6.5, which is not likely to be backported to older kernels. > > > To avoid waiting for events that won't arrive when testing old kernels, > > > require that kernel supports encoding fid with new flag AT_HADNLE_FID, > > > also merged to 6.5 and not likely to be backported to older kernels. > > Unfortunately Petr's not here at the moment. > > I guess this first patch doesn't require 6.6? So it could be merged > > independently without further considerations for what makes it into 6.6? > Yes that is correct. I'm finally back :). Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel I'll ask Cyril this patch to be merged before LTP release (final day today before git freeze). Kind regards, Petr > Thanks, > Amir.