Re: [PATCH 00/15] Tidy up file permission hooks

[Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:32:39PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> I realize you won't have time to review this week, but wanted to get
> this series out for review for a wider audience soon.
> 
> During my work on fanotify "pre content" events [1], Jan and I noticed
> some inconsistencies in the call sites of security_file_permission()
> hooks inside rw_verify_area() and remap_verify_area().
> 
> The majority of call sites are before file_start_write(), which is how
> we want them to be for fanotify "pre content" events.
> 
> For splice code, there are many duplicate calls to rw_verify_area()
> for the entire range as well as for partial ranges inside iterator.
> 
> This cleanup series, mostly following Jan's suggestions, moves all
> the security_file_permission() hooks before file_start_write() and
> eliminates duplicate permission hook calls in the same call chain.
> 
> The last 3 patches are helpers that I used in fanotify patches to
> assert that permission hooks are called with expected locking scope.
> 
> My hope is to get this work reviewed and staged in the vfs tree
> for the 6.8 cycle, so that I can send Jan fanotify patches for
> "pre content" events based on a stable branch in the vfs tree.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.

You can add

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

to patches 1-11.  Thanks,

Josef