From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] overlay: create a variant to syncfs error test xfs/546
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 20:08:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830180844.857283-1-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
Test overlayfs over xfs with and without "volatile" mount option.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
Zorro,
I was going to make a generic test from xfs/546, so that overlayfs could
also run it, but then I realized that ext4 does not behave as xfs in
that case (it returns success on syncfs post shutdown).
Unless and until this behavior is made a standard, I made an overlayfs
specialized test instead, which checks for underlying fs xfs.
While at it, I also added test coverage for the "volatile" mount options
that is expected to return succuss in that case regardles of the
behavior of the underlying fs.
Thanks,
Amir.
tests/overlay/087 | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/overlay/087.out | 4 +++
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/overlay/087
create mode 100644 tests/overlay/087.out
diff --git a/tests/overlay/087 b/tests/overlay/087
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..a5afb0d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/overlay/087
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2022 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
+# Copyright (c) 2024 CTERA Networks. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test No. 087
+#
+# This is a variant of test xfs/546 for overlayfs
+# with and without the "volatile" mount option.
+# It only works over xfs underlying fs.
+#
+# Regression test for kernel commits:
+#
+# 5679897eb104 ("vfs: make sync_filesystem return errors from ->sync_fs")
+# 2d86293c7075 ("xfs: return errors in xfs_fs_sync_fs")
+#
+# During a code inspection, I noticed that sync_filesystem ignores the return
+# value of the ->sync_fs calls that it makes. sync_filesystem, in turn is used
+# by the syncfs(2) syscall to persist filesystem changes to disk. This means
+# that syncfs(2) does not capture internal filesystem errors that are neither
+# visible from the block device (e.g. media error) nor recorded in s_wb_err.
+# XFS historically returned 0 from ->sync_fs even if there were log failures,
+# so that had to be corrected as well.
+#
+# The kernel commits above fix this problem, so this test tries to trigger the
+# bug by using the shutdown ioctl on a clean, freshly mounted filesystem in the
+# hope that the EIO generated as a result of the filesystem being shut down is
+# only visible via ->sync_fs.
+#
+. ./common/preamble
+_begin_fstest auto quick mount shutdown
+
+
+# Modify as appropriate.
+_require_xfs_io_command syncfs
+_require_scratch_nocheck
+_require_scratch_shutdown
+
+[ "$OVL_BASE_FSTYP" == "xfs" ] || \
+ _notrun "base fs $OVL_BASE_FSTYP has unknown behavior with syncfs after shutdown"
+
+# Reuse the fs formatted when we checked for the shutdown ioctl, and don't
+# bother checking the filesystem afterwards since we never wrote anything.
+echo "=== syncfs after shutdown"
+_scratch_mount
+# This command is complicated a bit because in the case of overlayfs the
+# syncfs fd needs to be opened before shutdown and it is different from the
+# shutdown fd, so we cannot use the _scratch_shutdown() helper.
+# Filter out xfs_io output of active fds.
+$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "open $(_scratch_shutdown_handle)" -c 'shutdown -f ' -c close -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT | \
+ grep -vF '[00'
+
+# Now repeat the same test with a volatile overlayfs mount and expect no error
+_scratch_unmount
+echo "=== syncfs after shutdown (volatile)"
+_scratch_mount -o volatile
+$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "open $(_scratch_shutdown_handle)" -c 'shutdown -f ' -c close -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT | \
+ grep -vF '[00'
+
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/overlay/087.out b/tests/overlay/087.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..44b538d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/overlay/087.out
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+QA output created by 087
+=== syncfs after shutdown
+syncfs: Input/output error
+=== syncfs after shutdown (volatile)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 18:08 Amir Goldstein [this message]
2024-09-02 19:07 ` [PATCH] overlay: create a variant to syncfs error test xfs/546 Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-02 19:46 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-09-02 19:59 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-03 4:21 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-03 6:41 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-09-04 2:58 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-04 8:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-09-04 11:25 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-17 14:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-09-17 14:51 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-19 13:58 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-19 14:47 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240830180844.857283-1-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).