From: Atom2 <ariel.atom2@web2web.at>
To: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: stat inconsistency with overlayfs
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:15:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E779BB.8030209@web2web.at> (raw)
I am using find with its printf "%D" option (provides the same
information as stats device information "%d" - device number in decimal)
to figure out whether a file system entry resides in the r/o lowerdir or
the r/w upperdir of an overlayfs mounted filesystem. I distinguish
between the two by getting the device number from a (plain) file know to
be in the upperdir.
The use case behind that is to be able to backup only files from the
upperdir for several systems sharing a common lowerdir filesystem. I
have used that (scripted approach via rsync) now for quiet some time and
a few kernels back and it seemed to have worked very well.
Currently I am using kernel 3.17.7 on gentoo and I seem to observe a
strange behaviour (which I do not recall to have seen before on 3.13 and
3.11) with my approach as follows:
.) plain files still work and the device number is correct
.) directories, however, always seem to reside in the lowerdir - even
thoguh they do not exist there; in fact there's not a single file in the
whole filesystem hierarchy that, according to stat/find, seems to reside
in the upperdir:
please see the stat output for a file and a directory, both residing in
the same (parent) directory which is completely located in the upperdir
(and does not at all exist in the lowerdir):
# stat serial
File: ‘serial’
Size: 17 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: ca03h/51715d Inode: 88 Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2014-02-19 19:01:56.278161346 +0100
Modify: 2014-02-19 19:01:56.278161346 +0100
Change: 2014-02-19 19:01:56.278161346 +0100
Birth: -
#
# stat certs/
File: ‘certs/’
Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: dh/13d Inode: 331140 Links: 2
Access: (0700/drwx------) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2014-04-26 14:08:47.337968562 +0200
Modify: 2014-02-19 18:55:58.458161346 +0100
Change: 2014-02-19 18:55:58.458161346 +0100
Birth: -
For comparision, please see the stat of /bin which only resides in the
lowerdir and does not exist in the upperdir:
# stat /bin
File: ‘/bin’
Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: dh/13d Inode: 401777 Links: 2
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2015-02-20 17:50:24.066368607 +0100
Modify: 2015-02-09 17:51:18.000000000 +0100
Change: 2015-02-09 23:58:06.011825328 +0100
Birth: -
I do not think that this is the expected behaviour and I am pretty
confident that this was different on older kernels - or am I missing
anything/doing anything wrong here?
Thanks and regards Atom2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-20 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 18:15 Atom2 [this message]
2015-02-26 5:25 ` stat inconsistency with overlayfs hujianyang
2015-02-26 6:45 ` Xu Wang
2015-03-02 20:45 ` Atom2
2015-03-03 15:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
2015-03-03 17:12 ` Atom2
2015-03-04 2:24 ` hujianyang
2015-03-04 11:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2015-03-02 20:45 ` Atom2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54E779BB.8030209@web2web.at \
--to=ariel.atom2@web2web.at \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox