From: Jan Olszak <j.olszak@samsung.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Optional switching off cow in overlayfs
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:26:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55881B2A.7090106@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegsVqzVhq8BjCwqA+6dEZey0aNb4amnnOT_JVDfzki9v1g@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/22/2015 03:53 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Jan Olszak <j.olszak@samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> The lower fs is most likely ext4.
>> Unfortunately making a file immutable won't solve the problem. There's
>> nothing wrong in modifying the file and it should stay possible.
>>
>> I just want to switch off copy on write for some files. Can you see another
>> way?
> Ah, you want to allow modification of file on the lower layer?
Exactly
> You can bind mount individual files from the lower layer to the
> overlay. That fixes the "allow modification" part.
Well bind mounting every file that should have COW is unmaintainable -
if new files appear admin has to mount each one.
Plus all the unnecessary mounts. It's much easier to do it the opposite
way - by default have COW and only for some files switch it off.
> But what should happen on rename or unlink?
Both would operate on the original inode.
Setting "trusted.overlay.cow" is a privileged operation so it's admin's
decision to allow this.
Each layer could potentially make the a file COW again by
setting/removing "trusted.overlay.cow" attr.
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-22 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-18 13:25 Optional switching off cow in overlayfs Jan Olszak
2015-06-18 13:39 ` David Howells
2015-06-18 14:43 ` Jan Olszak
2015-06-22 11:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2015-06-22 13:45 ` Jan Olszak
2015-06-22 13:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2015-06-22 14:26 ` Jan Olszak [this message]
2015-06-22 14:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2015-06-22 15:32 ` Jan Olszak
2015-06-23 9:27 ` David Howells
2015-06-23 10:36 ` Jan Olszak
2015-06-23 13:23 ` David Howells
2015-06-23 16:05 ` Jan Olszak
2015-06-23 16:07 ` Jan Olszak
2015-06-24 16:03 ` Jan Olszak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55881B2A.7090106@samsung.com \
--to=j.olszak@samsung.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).