From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] overlay: use default overlay mount options _overlay_mount_dirs()
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:50:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxhr+1g0Pa8-UPTfG2k-ebU1aCygsXfwmFjjgrpf-gFq2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506495852-7295-3-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tests that use _overlay_mount_dirs() should also use the
> default overlay mount options.
Vivek, Eryu,
I should make a disclaimer here: I did not test with SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS
because I have no SELinux in my test setup.
Specifically, I am concerned that tests that compose "special" overlay mounts,
like tmpfs mounts and stacked overlay mounts (overlay/029) may not play well
with SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS applied to the special mounts.
I am less concerned about the tests that were converted to use
_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs() helper.
Can either of you run a -g overlay/quick test with this series and valid
SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS?
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-27 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-27 7:04 [PATCH 0/4] fstests: fixes for config option OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27 7:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] overlay: remove stale implementation of _scratch_mount_options Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27 7:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] overlay: use default overlay mount options _overlay_mount_dirs() Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27 7:50 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2017-09-27 8:05 ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-12 6:08 ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-11 11:33 ` Eryu Guan
2017-09-27 7:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] overlay: create helper _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs() Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27 7:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] overlay: fix _overlay_config_override of MOUNT_OPTIONS Amir Goldstein
2017-10-11 11:50 ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-11 12:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-09-27 10:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] overlay: move _overlay helpers to common/overlay Amir Goldstein
2017-09-28 11:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] overlay: deduplicate code in overlay mount helpers Amir Goldstein
2017-09-29 1:44 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOQ4uxhr+1g0Pa8-UPTfG2k-ebU1aCygsXfwmFjjgrpf-gFq2Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).