linux-unionfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"Miklos Szeredi" <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
	linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Aleksa Sarai" <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
	"Giuseppe Scrivano" <gscrivan@redhat.com>,
	"Rodrigo Campos Catelin" <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>,
	"Seth Forshee" <sforshee@digitalocean.com>,
	"Luca Bocassi" <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>,
	"Lennart Poettering" <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
	"Stéphane Graber" <stgraber@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] overlay: support idmapped layers
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:58:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkTEWy7byDiPAvzc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220329103526.1207086-1-brauner@kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:35:07PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> From: "Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@kernel.org>
> 
> Hey,
> 
> This adds support for mounting overlay on top of idmapped layers.
> 
> I have to start by saying a massive thank you to Amir! He did not just
> answer my constant overlay questions but also provided quite a few
> patches himself in this series in addition to reviews, comments and a
> lot of suggestions. Thank you!
> 
> There have been a lot of requests to unblock this. For just a few select
> examples see [3], [4], and [5]. I've worked closely with various
> communities among them containerd, Kubernetes, Podman, LXD, runC, crun,
> and systemd (For the curious please see the various pull-request and
> issues below.) a lot of them already support idmapped mounts since they
> are enabled for btrfs, ext4, and xfs (and f2fs and fat fwiw). In
> additon, a few colleagues at Microsoft and from Red Hat work on a
> Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals (KEP) that also relies on overlayfs
> supporting idmapped layers, see [12].
> 
> Overlayfs on top of idmapped layers will be used in various ways:
> 
> * Container managers use overlayfs to efficiently share layers between
>   containers. However, this only works for privileged containers.
>   Layers cannot be shared if both privileged and unprivileged containers
>   are used. Layers can also not be shared if non-overlapping idmappings
>   are used for unprivileged containers. Layers cannot be shared because
>   of the conflicting ownership requirements between the containers.

Hi Christian,

Thank you for this work. This is awesome.

Wanted to test it. I was wondering how to test it. Some simple
instructions will help.

I am assuming I will need to be priviliged to be able to setup idmapped
mounts. And then overlay can be mounted on top of these layers (either
as a priviliged operation outside container or unprivileged overlayfs
inside container). Sorry, just trying to wrap my head around which
operations will require me to be priviliged (root in init_user_ns)
and which operations I can do unprivileged (as normal user).

Thanks
Vivek

> 
>   Both the KEP proposal (see [13]) and LXD (see [14]) use
>   non-overlapping idmappings to increase isolation.
> 
>   All of these cases can be supported if overlayfs can be mounted on
>   idmapped layers. The container runtime will create idmapped mounts for
>   the layers supposed to be shared. Each container will be given
>   idmapped mounts with the correct idmapping. Either by attaching a
>   custom or its own user namespace depending on the use-case. Then an
>   overlay mount can be mounted on top of the idmapped layers. The
>   underlying idmapped mounts can then be unmounted and the mount table
>   will be in a clean state.
>   This approach has been tested an verified by Giuseppe and others.
> 
> * Because of the inability to share layers preparing a layer causes a
>   big runtime overhead as ownership needs to be recursively changed.
>   This becomes increasingly costly with the bigger the layers are.
>   Especially for a large rootfs it becomes prohibitively expensive.
> 
>   This recursive ownership change also causes a lot storage overhead.
>   Without metacopy it can quickly become unmanagable. With metacopy it
>   still wastes a lot of space and inodes.
> 
>   For both the KEP and container manager being able to use idmapped
>   layer with overlayfs on top of it solves all these problems.
> 
> * Container managers such as LXD do run full system containers. Such
>   systems are managed like virtual machines and users run application
>   containers inside. Since LXD uses an idmapped mounts for the rootfs of
>   the container with the container's user namespace attached to the
>   mount container runtimes cannot user overlayfs inside.
> 
>   Once overlayfs can be mounted on top of idmapped layers it will be
>   possible for container runtimes to use overlayfs inside LXD
>   containers.
> 
> * The systemd-homed daemon and toolsuite is a new component of systemd
>   to manage home areas in a portable way. systemd-homed makes use of
>   idmapped mounts for the home areas. If the kernel and used file system
>   support it the user's home area will be mounted as an idmapped mount
>   when they log into their system.
> 
>   All files are internally owned by the "nobody" user (i.e. the user
>   typically used for indicating "this ownership is not mapped"), and
>   dynamically mapped to the {g,u}id used locally on the system via
>   idmapped mounts. This makes migrating home areas between different
>   systems trivial because recursively chown()ing file system trees is no
>   longer necessary. This also means that it is impossible to store files
>   as {g,u}id 0 on disk.
> 
>   Once overlayfs can be mounted on top of idmapped layers it will be
>   possible for container runtimes to work better together with
>   systemd-homed.
> 
> * systemd provides various sandboxing features (see [11]) for services.
>   These serve as hardening measures. In this context, idmapped mounts
>   can be used to prevent services from creating files on disk as {g,u}id
>   0, making specific files inaccessible, or to prevent access to whole
>   directories. Since such services may also make use of overlayfs for
>   e.g. the ExtensionImages= option supporting overlayfs on top of
>   idmapped layers would be another huge hardening win.
> 
> * systemd provides the ability to use system extension images [15] for
>   /usr and /opt (with a look to /etc in the future). Such system
>   extension images contain files and directories similar in fashion to
>   a regular OS system tree. When one or more system extension images are
>   activated, their /usr/ and /opt/ hierarchies are combined via
>   overlay with the same hierarchies of the host OS, and the host /usr/
>   and /opt/ overmounted with it ("merging"). These images are read-only.
> 
>   This feature is available to unprivileged container and sandboxed
>   services as well. Idmapped layers are used here to avoid runtime and
>   storage overhead from recursively changing ownership and ultimately an
>   overlay mount is supposed to be created on top of it.
> 
> Giuseppe provided testing for runC/crun/Podman and he put up a pull
> request to support overlayfs on top of idmapped layers at [16]. That
> already covers a lot of users. Other tools have put up pull requests as
> well and they are linked below.
> 
> The patchset has been extensively tested for about 2 weeks with
> xfstests. The tests and results are explained in the following
> paragraphs.
> 
> In order to test overlayfs with idmapped mounts a simple patch to
> xfstests has been added which is part of this series. The patchset
> simply allows for each test in the xfstests suite to be run on top of
> idmapped mounts. That is in addition to the generic idmapped mount tests
> that have existed and are already run for a long time.
> 
> Since idmapped mounts can be created on top of btrfs, ext4, and xfs and
> these are the most relevant filesystems for users they were taken into
> the test matrix.
> 
> Amir ensured that the test matrix also includes metacopy. So all tests
> are run once with metacopy=on and once with metacopy=off.
> 
> Additionally, the unionmount tesuite that Amir maintains was run as part
> of xfstests. This brings testing for multi layer overlay and a few
> rarely used overlayfs use-cases.
> 
> And last, xfstests were run with and without idmapped mounts.
> 
> Since the patch series is based on Linux 5.17 the 5.17 kernel was chosen
> as a baseline kernel. The baseline kernel is pure 5.17 upstream without
> any of the patches in this series. The baseline kernel was used to run
> all xfstests with the same parameters minus the idmapped mount part of
> the test matrix. This ensured that regressions would be immediately
> noticeable.
> 
> So the full test matrix is:
> 
> ext4 x metacopy=off x -idmapped mounts
> ext4 x metacopy=on  x -idmapped mounts
> ext4 x metacopy=off x +idmapped mounts
> ext4 x metacopy=on  x +idmapped mounts
> 
> xfs x metacopy=off x -idmapped mounts
> xfs x metacopy=on  x -idmapped mounts
> xfs x metacopy=off x +idmapped mounts
> xfs x metacopy=on  x +idmapped mounts
> 
> btrfs x metacopy=off x -idmapped mounts
> btrfs x metacopy=on  x -idmapped mounts
> btrfs x metacopy=off x +idmapped mounts
> btrfs x metacopy=on  x +idmapped mounts
> 
> The test runs were started with:
> 
> sudo ./check -overlay
> 
> so they encompass all xfstests apart from those that needed to be
> excluded because they triggered known issues (One such example is
> generic/530 which causes an xfs corruption that is currently under
> discussion for a fix upstream.).
> 
> A single testrun with over 750 tests takes a bonkers long time given
> that I run them in a beefy VM on top of an ssd and not on bare metal.
> 
> The successes and failures are identical for the whole test matrix with
> and without idmapped mounts. The tests and failures are also identical
> compared to the baseline kernel. All in all this should provide a good
> amount of convidence. The full test output can be found in the following
> repo: https://gitlab.com/brauner/fs.idmapped.overlay.xfstests.output
> 
> In order to create an idmapped mount the mount_setattr() system call
> (see [17]) can be used together with the MOUNT_ATTR_IDMAP flag to attach
> a userns fd to a detached mount created with open_tree()'s
> OPEN_TREE_CLONE flag. The only effect is that the idmapping of the
> userns becomes the idmapping of the relevant. The links below should
> serve to illustrate how widely they are already used.
> 
> For people who would like to test I've created a tag fs.idmapped.overlay.v1
> which can be fetched:
> 
> git fetch git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git fs.idmapped.overlay.v1
> 
> the same goes for xfstests:
> 
> git fetch git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/xfstests-dev.git fs.idmapped.overlay.v1
> 
> Thanks!
> Christian
> 
> [1]: OCI runtime-spec extension for idmapped mounts
>      https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/pull/1143
> 
> [2]: Support for idmapped mounts for shared volumes
>      https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/pull/3429
> 
> [3]: containerd support for idmapped mounts with focus on overlayfs
>      https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/5890
> 
> [4]: runC support for idmapped mounts with focus on overlayfs
>      https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/issues/2821
> 
> [5]: Podman support for idmapped mounts with focus on overlayfs
>      https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/10374
> 
> [6]: systemd-nspawn support for idmapped mounts
>      https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/19438
> 
> [7]: systemd-homed support for idmapped mounts
>      https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/21136
> 
> [8]: LXD support for idmapped mounts
>      https://github.com/lxc/lxd/pull/8778
> 
> [9]: LXC support for idmapped mounts
>      https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/3709
> 
> [10]: crun support for idmapped mounts
>       https://github.com/containers/crun/pull/874
> 
> [11]: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.exec.html#Sandboxing
> 
> [12]: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/3065
> 
> [13]: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/3065/files#diff-a9ca9fbce1538447b92f03125ca2b8474e2d875071f1172d2afa0b1e8cadeabaR118
> 
> [14]: https://github.com/lxc/lxd/blob/master/doc/instances.md
>       (The relevant entry can be found by looking for the
>        "security.idmap.isolated" key.)
> 
> [15]: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-sysext.html
> 
> [16]: https://github.com/containers/storage/pull/1180
> 
> [17]: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/mount_setattr.2.html
> 
> Amir Goldstein (3):
>   ovl: use wrappers to all vfs_*xattr() calls
>   ovl: pass layer mnt to ovl_open_realfile()
>   ovl: store lower path in ovl_inode
> 
> Christian Brauner (15):
>   fs: add two trivial lookup helpers
>   exportfs: support idmapped mounts
>   ovl: pass ofs to creation operations
>   ovl: handle idmappings in creation operations
>   ovl: pass ofs to setattr operations
>   ovl: use ovl_do_notify_change() wrapper
>   ovl: use ovl_lookup_upper() wrapper
>   ovl: use ovl_path_getxattr() wrapper
>   ovl: handle idmappings for layer fileattrs
>   ovl: handle idmappings for layer lookup
>   ovl: use ovl_copy_{real,upper}attr() wrappers
>   ovl: handle idmappings in ovl_permission()
>   ovl: handle idmappings in layer open helpers
>   ovl: handle idmappings in ovl_xattr_{g,s}et()
>   ovl: support idmapped layers
> 
>  fs/exportfs/expfs.c      |   5 +-
>  fs/namei.c               |  52 +++++++--
>  fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c   |  97 +++++++++-------
>  fs/overlayfs/dir.c       | 133 +++++++++++-----------
>  fs/overlayfs/export.c    |   3 +-
>  fs/overlayfs/file.c      |  44 ++++----
>  fs/overlayfs/inode.c     |  63 +++++++----
>  fs/overlayfs/namei.c     |  49 ++++++---
>  fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h |   7 +-
>  fs/overlayfs/readdir.c   |  48 ++++----
>  fs/overlayfs/super.c     |  57 +++++-----
>  fs/overlayfs/util.c      | 142 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/namei.h    |   2 +
>  14 files changed, 607 insertions(+), 326 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 10:35 [PATCH 00/18] overlay: support idmapped layers Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 01/18] fs: add two trivial lookup helpers Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 02/18] exportfs: support idmapped mounts Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 03/18] ovl: use wrappers to all vfs_*xattr() calls Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 11:18   ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 04/18] ovl: pass ofs to creation operations Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 05/18] ovl: handle idmappings in " Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 11:22   ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 06/18] ovl: pass ofs to setattr operations Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 07/18] ovl: pass layer mnt to ovl_open_realfile() Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 08/18] ovl: use ovl_do_notify_change() wrapper Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 11:56   ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-03-29 12:36     ` Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 09/18] ovl: use ovl_lookup_upper() wrapper Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 10/18] ovl: use ovl_path_getxattr() wrapper Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 11/18] ovl: handle idmappings for layer fileattrs Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 12/18] ovl: handle idmappings for layer lookup Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 13/18] ovl: store lower path in ovl_inode Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 14/18] ovl: use ovl_copy_{real,upper}attr() wrappers Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 15/18] ovl: handle idmappings in ovl_permission() Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 16/18] ovl: handle idmappings in layer open helpers Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 17/18] ovl: handle idmappings in ovl_xattr_{g,s}et() Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH 18/18] ovl: support idmapped layers Christian Brauner
2022-03-29 12:25 ` [PATCH 00/18] overlay: " Miklos Szeredi
2022-03-29 15:02   ` Amir Goldstein
2022-03-30 20:58 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2022-03-31  8:47   ` Christian Brauner
2022-03-31  9:55     ` Giuseppe Scrivano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YkTEWy7byDiPAvzc@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.boccassi@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
    --cc=rodrigoca@microsoft.com \
    --cc=sforshee@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=stgraber@ubuntu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).