From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ovl: update of dentry revalidate flags after copy up
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:21:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae948b16-d35a-64eb-b9f4-127f66c232bb@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230408164302.1392694-2-amir73il@gmail.com>
On 2023/4/9 00:42, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> After copy up, we may need to update d_flags if upper dentry is on a
> remote fs and lower dentries are not.
>
> Add helpers to allow incremental update of the revalidate flags.
>
> Fixes: bccece1ead36 ("ovl: allow remote upper")
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 2 ++
> fs/overlayfs/dir.c | 3 +--
> fs/overlayfs/export.c | 3 +--
> fs/overlayfs/namei.c | 3 +--
> fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | 6 ++++--
> fs/overlayfs/super.c | 2 +-
> fs/overlayfs/util.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> index c14e90764e35..7bf101e756c8 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> @@ -576,6 +576,7 @@ static int ovl_link_up(struct ovl_copy_up_ctx *c)
> /* Restore timestamps on parent (best effort) */
> ovl_set_timestamps(ofs, upperdir, &c->pstat);
> ovl_dentry_set_upper_alias(c->dentry);
> + ovl_dentry_update_reval(c->dentry, upper);
> }
> }
> inode_unlock(udir);
> @@ -895,6 +896,7 @@ static int ovl_do_copy_up(struct ovl_copy_up_ctx *c)
> inode_unlock(udir);
>
> ovl_dentry_set_upper_alias(c->dentry);
> + ovl_dentry_update_reval(c->dentry, ovl_dentry_upper(c->dentry));
> }
>
> out:
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> index fc25fb95d5fc..9be52d8013c8 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> @@ -269,8 +269,7 @@ static int ovl_instantiate(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
>
> ovl_dir_modified(dentry->d_parent, false);
> ovl_dentry_set_upper_alias(dentry);
> - ovl_dentry_update_reval(dentry, newdentry,
> - DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE | DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE);
> + ovl_dentry_init_reval(dentry, newdentry);
>
> if (!hardlink) {
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/export.c b/fs/overlayfs/export.c
> index defd4e231ad2..5c36fb3a7bab 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/export.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/export.c
> @@ -326,8 +326,7 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_obtain_alias(struct super_block *sb,
> if (upper_alias)
> ovl_dentry_set_upper_alias(dentry);
>
> - ovl_dentry_update_reval(dentry, upper,
> - DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE | DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE);
> + ovl_dentry_init_reval(dentry, upper);
>
> return d_instantiate_anon(dentry, inode);
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/namei.c b/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
> index cfb3420b7df0..100a492d2b2a 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
> @@ -1122,8 +1122,7 @@ struct dentry *ovl_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> ovl_set_flag(OVL_UPPERDATA, inode);
> }
>
> - ovl_dentry_update_reval(dentry, upperdentry,
> - DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE | DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE);
> + ovl_dentry_init_reval(dentry, upperdentry);
>
> revert_creds(old_cred);
> if (origin_path) {
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> index 4d0b278f5630..e100c55bb924 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> @@ -375,8 +375,10 @@ bool ovl_index_all(struct super_block *sb);
> bool ovl_verify_lower(struct super_block *sb);
> struct ovl_entry *ovl_alloc_entry(unsigned int numlower);
> bool ovl_dentry_remote(struct dentry *dentry);
> -void ovl_dentry_update_reval(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *upperdentry,
> - unsigned int mask);
> +void ovl_dentry_update_reval(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *realdentry);
> +void ovl_dentry_init_reval(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *upperdentry);
> +void ovl_dentry_init_flags(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *upperdentry,
> + unsigned int mask);
> bool ovl_dentry_weird(struct dentry *dentry);
> enum ovl_path_type ovl_path_type(struct dentry *dentry);
> void ovl_path_upper(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *path);
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> index f1d9f75f8786..49b6956468f9 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> @@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_get_root(struct super_block *sb,
> ovl_dentry_set_flag(OVL_E_CONNECTED, root);
> ovl_set_upperdata(d_inode(root));
> ovl_inode_init(d_inode(root), &oip, ino, fsid);
> - ovl_dentry_update_reval(root, upperdentry, DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE);
> + ovl_dentry_init_flags(root, upperdentry, DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE);
>
> return root;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/util.c b/fs/overlayfs/util.c
> index 923d66d131c1..6a0652bd51f2 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/util.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/util.c
> @@ -94,14 +94,30 @@ struct ovl_entry *ovl_alloc_entry(unsigned int numlower)
> return oe;
> }
>
> +#define OVL_D_REVALIDATE (DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE | DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE)
> +
> bool ovl_dentry_remote(struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> - return dentry->d_flags &
> - (DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE | DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE);
> + return dentry->d_flags & OVL_D_REVALIDATE;
> +}
> +
> +void ovl_dentry_update_reval(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *realdentry)
> +{
> + if (!ovl_dentry_remote(realdentry))
> + return;
> +
> + spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> + dentry->d_flags |= realdentry->d_flags & OVL_D_REVALIDATE;
Although I'm not sure if it could cause some lazy awareness due to dcache
RCU-walk, but maybe that is fine since such window is small?
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-08 16:42 [PATCH 0/7] Prepare for lazy lowerdata lookup Amir Goldstein
2023-04-08 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] ovl: update of dentry revalidate flags after copy up Amir Goldstein
2023-04-14 7:21 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2023-04-27 5:48 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 6:11 ` Gao Xiang
2023-04-08 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] ovl: use OVL_E() and OVL_E_FLAGS() accessors Amir Goldstein
2023-04-17 14:20 ` Alexander Larsson
2023-04-08 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] ovl: use ovl_numlower() and ovl_lowerstack() accessors Amir Goldstein
2023-04-17 14:38 ` Alexander Larsson
2023-04-08 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] ovl: factor out ovl_free_entry() and ovl_stack_*() helpers Amir Goldstein
2023-04-17 15:00 ` Alexander Larsson
2023-04-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] ovl: move ovl_entry into ovl_inode Amir Goldstein
2023-04-18 7:55 ` Alexander Larsson
2023-04-27 6:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] ovl: deduplicate lowerpath and lowerstack[0] Amir Goldstein
2023-04-18 8:10 ` Alexander Larsson
2023-04-27 6:29 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-26 12:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2023-04-27 6:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] ovl: replace lowerdata inode reference with lowerdata redirect Amir Goldstein
2023-04-18 8:19 ` Alexander Larsson
2023-04-26 12:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2023-04-27 6:32 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae948b16-d35a-64eb-b9f4-127f66c232bb@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alexl@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox