linux-unionfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>,
	Martin Brandenburg	 <martin@omnibond.com>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, Stefan Roesch	 <shr@fb.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
		gfs2@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@lists.orangefs.org,  linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,  linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:04:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7e8d5e3a0ce8da103f4591afc1f4a9c683ef3c7.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114062642.1524837-1-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, 2025-11-14 at 07:26 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> commit 66fa3cedf16a ("fs: Add async write file modification handling.")
> effectively disabled IOCB_NOWAIT writes as timestamp updates currently
> always require blocking, and the modern timestamp resolution means we
> always update timestamps.  This leads to a lot of context switches from
> applications using io_uring to submit file writes, making it often worse
> than using the legacy aio code that is not using IOCB_NOWAIT.
> 
> This series allows non-blocking updates for lazytime if the file system
> supports it, and adds that support for XFS.
> 
> It also fixes the layering bypass in btrfs when updating timestamps on
> device files for devices removed from btrfs usage, and FMODE_NOCMTIME
> handling in the VFS now that nfsd started using it.  Note that I'm still
> not sure that nfsd usage is fully correct for all file systems, as only
> XFS explicitly supports FMODE_NOCMTIME, but at least the generic code
> does the right thing now.
> 
> Diffstat:
>  Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst |    2 
>  Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst     |    6 ++
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c                      |    3 +
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c                    |   11 +--
>  fs/fat/misc.c                         |    3 +
>  fs/fs-writeback.c                     |   53 ++++++++++++++----
>  fs/gfs2/inode.c                       |    6 +-
>  fs/inode.c                            |  100 +++++++++++-----------------------
>  fs/internal.h                         |    3 -
>  fs/orangefs/inode.c                   |    7 ++
>  fs/overlayfs/inode.c                  |    3 +
>  fs/sync.c                             |    4 -
>  fs/ubifs/file.c                       |    9 +--
>  fs/utimes.c                           |    1 
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c                     |   29 ++++++++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c                    |   29 ---------
>  include/linux/fs.h                    |   17 +++--
>  include/trace/events/writeback.h      |    6 --
>  18 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)

This all looks pretty reasonable to me. There are a few changelog and
subject line typos, but the code changes look fine. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

As far as nfsd's usage of FMODE_NOCMTIME, it looks OK to me. That's
implemented today by the check in file_modified_flags(), which is
generic and should work across filesystems.

The main exception is xfs_exchange_range() which has some special
handling for it, but nfsd doesn't use that functionality so that
shouldn't be an issue.

Am I missing some subtlety?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-14 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14  6:26 re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] fs: refactor file timestamp update logic Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:32   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] fs: lift the FMODE_NOCMTIME check into file_update_time_flags Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:38   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] fs: export vfs_utimes Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:38   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] btrfs: use vfs_utimes to update file timestamps Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] fs: remove inode_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  6:59   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-19  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] organgefs: use inode_update_timestamps directly Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 14:06   ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 15:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] fs: return a negative error from generic_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:07   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] fs: exit early in generic_update_time when there is no work Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] fs: factor out a mark_inode_dirty_time helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:13   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] fs: factor out a sync_lazytime helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:38   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-19  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] fs: add a ->sync_lazytime method Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-17  7:50   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] fs: add support for non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] xfs: implement ->sync_lazytime Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14  6:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: enable non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 15:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-16  8:23   ` Dave Chinner
2025-11-19  7:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 14:04 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-11-14 15:28   ` re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 19:47     ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-14 17:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-14 17:21     ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7e8d5e3a0ce8da103f4591afc1f4a9c683ef3c7.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin@omnibond.com \
    --cc=shr@fb.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).