From: Jihong Min <hurryman2212@icloud.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Jihong Min <hurryman2212@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] hwmon: add AMD Promontory 21 xHCI temperature sensor support
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 02:40:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <021e9b61-46f9-4429-85be-242bb12e70a4@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f682afbb-e816-44e6-9b18-fc7e2335706e@amd.com>
> Rather than using pm_ref as an output variable to indicate whether you
> took a ref - how about you instead always take a ref on success and
> return an error on fail? This would feel more logical to me.
Agreed. I changed the PM helper so success always means that a usage
reference
is held, and the caller now unconditionally drops it with
pm_runtime_put_noidle()
after the register access.
For the runtime PM disabled case, pm_runtime_get_if_active() returns
-EINVAL.
In that case the helper now allows the read if the device is not marked
suspended, and uses pm_runtime_get_noresume() so the same success/put
contract
is preserved without changing the runtime PM state.
> guard(mutex) perhaps?
The private mutex is gone. Guenter pointed out that the hwmon core already
serializes the callbacks, so I removed the extra lock instead of
converting it.
> You only care about the first byte, right? Just use readb() and make
> data a u8.
Done. The data register read now uses readb(), and the local data
variable is
u8.
> I personally don't really like changing the pointer when there is
> potentially an error case with it for -ENODATA.
Done. The raw output pointer is only written after validating the read
value.
> Does 0xff actually happen with your runtime PM handling? Between my
> suggestion above to use readb() this can turn into:
>
> if (!data)
> return -ENODDATA;
> *raw = data;
>
> return 0;
Done. I removed the 0xff invalid check. Suspended devices are rejected
before
the MMIO access, so the read path now only treats zero as invalid and
assigns
*raw after that check.
Sincerely,
Jihong Min
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 14:39 [PATCH v4 0/2] AMD Promontory 21 xHCI temperature sensor support Jihong Min
2026-05-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] usb: xhci-pci: add AMD Promontory 21 PCI glue Jihong Min
2026-05-08 16:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-05-08 17:39 ` Jihong Min
2026-05-08 17:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-05-08 17:48 ` Jihong Min
2026-05-08 18:11 ` Jihong Min
2026-05-08 18:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-08 18:39 ` Jihong Min
2026-05-09 5:34 ` Jihong Min
2026-05-09 5:52 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-05-09 6:54 ` Jihong Min
2026-05-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] hwmon: add AMD Promontory 21 xHCI temperature sensor support Jihong Min
2026-05-08 15:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-08 17:37 ` Jihong Min
2026-05-08 16:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-05-08 17:40 ` Jihong Min [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=021e9b61-46f9-4429-85be-242bb12e70a4@icloud.com \
--to=hurryman2212@icloud.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hurryman2212@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox