Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: "Tomasz Moń" <tomasz.mon@nordicsemi.no>,
	"Andreas Noever" <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	"Michael Jamet" <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Yehezkel Bernat" <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB 2.0 host controller for Thunderbolt 4
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 11:44:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dc2e12d-052f-aa59-07df-5158b924ec12@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd807b391dec726401e36a25f8c8987571d771be.camel@nordicsemi.no>

On 23.05.23 10:53, Tomasz Moń wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Dell Latitude 5330 with 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1265U contains
> following PCI devices:
>    * 8086:461e - Alder Lake-P Thunderbolt 4 USB Controller
>    * 8086:51ed - Alder Lake PCH USB 3.2 xHCI Host Controller
> 
> Thunderbolt 4 USB Controller initializes first and therefore following
> usb host controllers are registered:
>    * usb1 - USB 2.0 High-Speed
>    * usb2 - USB 3.2 Enhanced SuperSpeed
>    * usb3 - USB 2.0 High-Speed
>    * usb4 - USB 3.1 Enhanced SuperSpeed
> 
> When I connect SuperSpeed device directly to the Dell Latitude, it ends
> up on usb4. Low/Full/High-Speed devices end up on usb3 as expected.
> 
> When I connect Thunderbolt 3 dock, two new host controllers show up:
>    * usb5 - USB 2.0 High-Speed
>    * usb6 - USB 3.0 SuperSpeed

Could you provide lspci in that state?
AFAICT there is nothing that would prevent a vendor from putting
a PCI HC into a TB3 docking station.

	Regards
		Oliver

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-23  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-23  8:53 USB 2.0 host controller for Thunderbolt 4 Tomasz Moń
2023-05-23  9:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-05-23  9:45   ` Moń, Tomasz
2023-05-23 11:03     ` Mathias Nyman
2023-05-23 12:54     ` mika.westerberg
2023-05-23  9:44 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2023-05-23  9:49   ` Tomasz Moń

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0dc2e12d-052f-aa59-07df-5158b924ec12@suse.com \
    --to=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tomasz.mon@nordicsemi.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox