public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Jun Li <jun.li@nxp.com>,
	"mathias.nyman@intel.com" <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci: wait USB2 port enter suspend for bus suspend
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 10:58:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ff0ea34-bf51-9b23-84a3-a67d63214751@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR04MB65282E8B0E8D2C0100FCE18D89F30@VE1PR04MB6528.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 2.12.2020 8.58, Jun Li wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 7:55 AM
>> To: Jun Li <jun.li@nxp.com>; mathias.nyman@intel.com
>> Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; Peter Chen
>> <peter.chen@nxp.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci: wait USB2 port enter suspend for bus
>> suspend
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 1.12.2020 8.12, Jun Li wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jun Li <jun.li@nxp.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 7:23 PM
>>>> To: mathias.nyman@intel.com
>>>> Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; Peter Chen
>>>> <peter.chen@nxp.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci: wait USB2 port enter suspend for
>>>> bus suspend
>>>>
>>>> If the connected USB2 device wakeup is not enabled/supported, the
>>>> link state may still be U0 when do xhci bus suspend, after we suspend
>>>> ports in U0, we need give time to device to enter suspend before do
>>>> further suspend operations (e.g. system suspend), otherwise we may
>>>> enter system suspend with link state at U0.
>>
>>
>> What side-effects have you observed if bus suspend returns while a port is
>> still transitioning to U3?
> 
> I found a real problem on remote wakeup by USB2 device disconnect
> on root port, that device(e.g. Udisk) itself does not support remote
> wakeup, the remote wakeup has problem if I enable USB2 DPDM wakeup
> when USB2 bus at U0.
> 
>>
>> I can't recall why we end up with ports in U0 in bus suspend anymore.
>> I think that in system suspend the link should be put to U3 already when
>> the usb device is suspended, before the bus suspends, even if it doesn't
>> support remote wakeup.
> 
> I also thought so but actually not, see below in usb_port_suspend():
> 
>   12         if (hub_is_superspeed(hub->hdev))
>   13                 status = hub_set_port_link_state(hub, port1, USB_SS_PORT_LS_U3); 
>   14 
>   15         /*
>   16          * For system suspend, we do not need to enable the suspend feature
>   17          * on individual USB-2 ports.  The devices will automatically go
>   18          * into suspend a few ms after the root hub stops sending packets.
>   19          * The USB 2.0 spec calls this "global suspend".
>   20          *
>   21          * However, many USB hubs have a bug: They don't relay wakeup requests
>   22          * from a downstream port if the port's suspend feature isn't on.
>   23          * Therefore we will turn on the suspend feature if udev or any of its
>   24          * descendants is enabled for remote wakeup.
>   25          */
>   26         else if (PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg) || usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants(udev) > 0)
>   27                 status = set_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
>   28                                 USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND);
>   29         else {
>   30                 really_suspend = false;
>   31                 status = 0;
>   32         }
> 
> usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants(udev) > 0 is not true, if the device itself
> does not support remote wakeup.
> 

You're right, link isn't set to U3 in this case. 

...
>>
>> if (bus_state->bus_suspended)
>> 	usleep_range(5000, 10000)
> 
> I will send your proposal if no more comments.

Yes, thanks, no more comments.

-Mathias


      reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-03 11:17 [PATCH] usb: host: xhci: wait USB2 port enter suspend for bus suspend Li Jun
2020-12-01  6:12 ` Jun Li
2020-12-01 23:55   ` Mathias Nyman
2020-12-02  6:58     ` Jun Li
2020-12-02  8:58       ` Mathias Nyman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ff0ea34-bf51-9b23-84a3-a67d63214751@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jun.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox