Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
To: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Check kcalloc_node() when allocating interrupter array in xhci_mem_init()
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:02:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11d7b29d-a45f-48e9-bff5-cb94150d0bdf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103094036.2d1593bc.michal.pecio@gmail.com>

On 11/3/25 10:40, Michal Pecio wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 21:08:38 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
>> kcalloc_node() may fail. When the interrupter array allocation returns
>> NULL, subsequent code uses xhci->interrupters (e.g. in xhci_add_interrupter()
>> and in cleanup paths), leading to a potential NULL pointer dereference.
>>
>> Check the allocation and bail out to the existing fail path to avoid
>> the NULL dereference.
>>
>> Fixes: c99b38c412343 ("xhci: add support to allocate several interrupters")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
>> index d698095fc88d..da257856e864 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
>> @@ -2505,7 +2505,8 @@ int xhci_mem_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
>>   		       "Allocating primary event ring");
>>   	xhci->interrupters = kcalloc_node(xhci->max_interrupters, sizeof(*xhci->interrupters),
>>   					  flags, dev_to_node(dev));
>> -
>> +	if (!xhci->interrupters)
>> +		goto fail;
>>   	ir = xhci_alloc_interrupter(xhci, 0, flags);
>>   	if (!ir)
>>   		goto fail;
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
> 
> Hi Greg and Mathias,
> 
> I noticed that this bug still exists in current 6.6 and 6.12 releases,
> what would be the sensible course of action to fix it?
> 

Not sure this qualifies for stable.
Is this something that has really happened in real life?

The stable-kernel-rules.rst states it should "fix a real bug that bothers people"

If kcalloc_node() fails to allocate that array of pointers then something
else is already badly messed up.

That being said, I don't object this being added to stable either

Thanks
Mathias



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18 13:08 [PATCH] usb: xhci: Check kcalloc_node() when allocating interrupter array in xhci_mem_init() Guangshuo Li
2025-09-18 15:38 ` Michal Pecio
2025-11-03  8:40 ` Michal Pecio
2025-11-03 11:02   ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2025-11-03 11:23     ` Michal Pecio
2025-11-03 11:49   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11d7b29d-a45f-48e9-bff5-cb94150d0bdf@intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox