linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>,
	stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: usb: storage: Fix a possible data race in uas_queuecommand_lck
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 10:27:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1525768070.24345.8.camel@suse.com> (raw)

Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2018, 15:47 +0800 schrieb Jia-Ju Bai:
> The write operations to "cmnd->result" and "cmnd->scsi_done" 
> are protected by the lock on line 642-643, but the write operations 
> to these data on line 634-635 are not protected by the lock.
> Thus, there may exist a data race for "cmnd->result" 
> and "cmnd->scsi_done".

No,

the write operations need no lock. The low level driver at this point
owns the command. We cannot race with abort() for a command within
queuecommand(). We take the lock where we take it to protect
dev->resetting.

I don't see why the scope of the lock would need to be enlarged.

	Regards
		Oliver

> To fix this data race, the write operations on line 634-635 
> should be also protected by the lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Nacked-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-08  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-08  8:27 Oliver Neukum [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-08  8:39 usb: storage: Fix a possible data race in uas_queuecommand_lck Jia-Ju Bai
2018-05-08  7:47 Jia-Ju Bai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1525768070.24345.8.camel@suse.com \
    --to=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).