From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: johan@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2/2] USB: usbdevfs: restore warning for nonsensical flags
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 12:01:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1536228066.20686.9.camel@suse.com> (raw)
On Mi, 2018-09-05 at 15:07 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:02:48PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Mi, 2018-09-05 at 14:19 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:07:03PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > + if (!allow_short && uurb->flags & USBDEVFS_URB_SHORT_NOT_OK)
> > > > + dev_warn(&ps->dev->dev, "Requested nonsensical USBDEVFS_URB_SHORT_NOT_OK.\n");
> > > > + if (!allow_zero && uurb->flags & USBDEVFS_URB_ZERO_PACKET)
> > > > + dev_warn(&ps->dev->dev, "Requested nonsensical USBDEVFS_URB_ZERO_PACKET.\n");
> > >
> > > We should not make it trivial for userspace to spam the kernel log if at
> > > all possible. Returning an error is probably the better thing to do
> > > here, not just silently fix it up or ignore it.
> >
> > That means a change in the API in a way that makes orking systems fail.
>
> Ah, good point.
Well, but do we want to do this in the next major release even if we
cannot do it in a stable release?
> I guess they were hitting the same dev_WARN() messages
> today anyway, right?
Yes. And for a kernel problem you really want the stack traces.
Still, that does not tell us that we want to print a message if
user space messes up. So dev_warn() or nothing?
> > Do you want an extra version for stable?
>
> No, but why was this patch not marked for stable?
I was under the impression that it was. This is a separate
patch because you could argue that it is unnecessary or that stable
and the next release should diverge on whether to take it.
Regards
Oliver
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-06 10:01 Oliver Neukum [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-20 10:47 [2/2] USB: usbdevfs: restore warning for nonsensical flags Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-06 15:34 Alan Stern
2018-09-05 13:07 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-05 13:02 Oliver Neukum
2018-09-05 12:19 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-05 10:07 Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1536228066.20686.9.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).