From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: "Ji-Ze Hong \(Peter Hong\)" <hpeter@gmail.com>,
peter_hong@fintek.com.tw, johan@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: "Ji-Ze Hong \(Peter Hong\)" <hpeter+linux_kernel@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND,V3,1/3] USB: serial: f81232: clear overrun flag
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:34:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554107689.6310.17.camel@suse.com> (raw)
On Mo, 2019-04-01 at 14:00 +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
Hi,
I am afraid there is a race condiion in this code.
> @@ -315,6 +318,7 @@ static void f81232_process_read_urb(struct urb *urb)
>
> if (lsr & UART_LSR_OE) {
> port->icount.overrun++;
> + schedule_work(&priv->lsr_work);
Unconditionally scheduled
> tty_insert_flip_char(&port->port, 0,
> TTY_OVERRUN);
> }
[..]
> +static int f81232_suspend(struct usb_serial *serial, pm_message_t message)
> +{
> + struct f81232_private *port_priv;
> +
> + port_priv = usb_get_serial_port_data(serial->port[0]);
> + flush_work(&port_priv->lsr_work);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct usb_serial_driver f81232_device = {
> .driver = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> @@ -655,6 +688,7 @@ static struct usb_serial_driver f81232_device = {
> .read_int_callback = f81232_read_int_callback,
> .port_probe = f81232_port_probe,
> .port_remove = f81232_port_remove,
> + .suspend = f81232_suspend,
Please have a look at:
int usb_serial_suspend(struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t message)
{
struct usb_serial *serial = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
int i, r = 0;
serial->suspending = 1;
/*
* serial->type->suspend() MUST return 0 in system sleep context,
* otherwise, the resume callback has to recover device from
* previous suspend failure.
*/
if (serial->type->suspend) {
r = serial->type->suspend(serial, message);
if (r < 0) {
serial->suspending = 0;
goto err_out;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < serial->num_ports; ++i)
usb_serial_port_poison_urbs(serial->port[i]);
err_out:
return r;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(usb_serial_suspend);
As you can see, the suspend method is called first and then the URBs
are poisoned. That means that after you have flushed the work, it may
be submitted again. The fix would be to test the 'suspending' flag
before you schedule work (and recheck the need to schedule it
during resume)
Regards
Oliver
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-01 8:34 Oliver Neukum [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-01 9:01 [RESEND,V3,1/3] USB: serial: f81232: clear overrun flag Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
2019-04-01 6:00 Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1554107689.6310.17.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpeter+linux_kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=hpeter@gmail.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter_hong@fintek.com.tw \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).