From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Erik Slagter <erik@slagter.name>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Caujolle-Bert <f1rmb.daniel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] USB: cdc-acm: clean up no-union-descriptor handling
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:17:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1600708657.2942.2.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921151605.GY24441@localhost>
Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 17:16 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> > > interface? By hardcoding the data-interface number to be the one and
> > > only interface, you'd end up probing for a "combined" interface also
> > > with a broken call-management descriptor.
> >
> > Well, by the changelog assuming a combined interface caused an oops.
> > Thence I am forced to conclude that the davices _has_ a separate
> > data interface, but no union descriptor.
>
> No, the oops was probably due to the missing sanity check later added by
> 403dff4e2c94 ("USB: cdc-acm: check for valid interfaces").
>
> With a broken call-management descriptor pointing to a non-existent
> interface we'd oops before that commit.
Hi,
maybe I am dense, but a patch that comes after a patch that is said to
fix something? Furthermore that patch would not come it work,
it would merely make probe() fail cleanly. If I read the changelog
correctly, the change makes the device work.
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-21 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-21 13:59 [PATCH v2 0/4] USB: cdc-acm: handle broken union descriptors Johan Hovold
2020-09-21 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] Revert "cdc-acm: hardening against malicious devices" Johan Hovold
2020-09-21 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] USB: cdc-acm: handle broken union descriptors Johan Hovold
2020-09-22 9:53 ` <Daniel Caujolle-Bert>
2020-09-21 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] USB: cdc-acm: use common data-class define Johan Hovold
2020-09-21 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] USB: cdc-acm: clean up no-union-descriptor handling Johan Hovold
2020-09-21 14:16 ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-21 14:28 ` Johan Hovold
2020-09-21 15:04 ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-21 15:16 ` Johan Hovold
2020-09-21 17:17 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2020-09-22 7:05 ` Johan Hovold
2020-09-22 10:40 ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-22 10:54 ` Johan Hovold
2020-09-22 11:41 ` Oliver Neukum
2020-09-22 11:47 ` Johan Hovold
2020-09-21 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] USB: cdc-acm: handle broken union descriptors <Daniel Caujolle-Bert>
2020-09-21 16:19 ` <Daniel Caujolle-Bert>
2020-09-22 7:08 ` Johan Hovold
2020-09-22 9:56 ` <Daniel Caujolle-Bert>
2020-09-22 10:07 ` Johan Hovold
2020-09-22 12:10 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1600708657.2942.2.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=erik@slagter.name \
--cc=f1rmb.daniel@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).