From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244C42931D2; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 04:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791173978; cv=none; b=Kg3/2TXGlw96IbeXFCUgCqQsEw2iY6E6L5fIKPdTaWCv5wL6NlfO1zfLHuD0hGYV4QIWBMHxXmwwI5DbJiIm9vrTtGTAdzg/69rgQcdr+hLFeUcROqmBwlRDBxiVBaTf5q8OOvbgsUU+txtpR3dbtXDOr2wWqAl1KpHLN0l+ExA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791173978; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=UFzf5YGqd2Nq5kOCVhnxz+JW4YQqv0Wfv85H0sTNc7EqvEBzPitgUik4Ty3h56oK25bk3YUBsvDWCO3+w0j0rxKTpJLeP/lLv//8LJ5VSD74t1xQ8NcXzNAW0dvuA/n/XIvDodSOHM6CQ24Iyv4fCfkCxjgmEqbB5GKjHpcp4kk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Fru/giSs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Fru/giSs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 171701F000FF; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 04:19:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791173976; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Fru/giSsugjTRtgtwTHac0TT/r5A7B5so/D26YSpe31mtO1j+iYSPZPAMKXK/D68E IBf6ZU65Ta0mnTFg4UmyTjI5Hh9DcL6+zWWddMFXjPryMrD2ZVDteocOFosI3zThQU zFPrYLxDoXXgPocNQCBu7srw02e5sPxR+QFCsmRridEtyn4afSxUZW7sv3oi9UrqYd hw7nfuFgz0XsOCegLx8Jr6kF2uu6MhctMph7YCOiHtZaljwwA0nSFc4PnwDJZo1ZPN U2Te0F/fOt81zgSseURdPcGs3virEoJC6UngZ0BEVhKshlyeqgzqUeJjJdBnWm8EJu xLzUnkLFykH5g== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Xinsheng Zhu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oliver@neukum.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: usb: cdc_ncm: reject short GET_NTB_PARAMETERS responses Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 04:19:35 +0000 Message-ID: <179117397560.1402591.15477443356899321449@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261005041525.49111-1-xinsheng.zhu.ny@gmail.com> References: <20261005041525.49111-1-xinsheng.zhu.ny@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.