From: "Rangoju, Raju" <raju.rangoju@amd.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, mathias.nyman@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: quirk for data loss in ISOC transfers
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:41:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19452eb2-10e7-e90e-fdf0-19269d04e84c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024111330-crusher-alike-a88d@gregkh>
On 11/13/2024 11:35 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 07:02:40PM +0530, Rangoju, Raju wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/2024 5:54 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 05:51:04PM +0530, Raju Rangoju wrote:
>>>> During the High-Speed Isochronous Audio transfers, xHCI
>>>> controller on certain AMD platforms experiences momentary data
>>>> loss. This results in Missed Service Errors (MSE) being
>>>> generated by the xHCI.
>>>>
>>>> The root cause of the MSE is attributed to the ISOC OUT endpoint
>>>> being omitted from scheduling. This can happen either when an IN
>>>> endpoint with a 64ms service interval is pre-scheduled prior to
>>>> the ISOC OUT endpoint or when the interval of the ISOC OUT
>>>> endpoint is shorter than that of the IN endpoint. Consequently,
>>>> the OUT service is neglected when an IN endpoint with a service
>>>> interval exceeding 32ms is scheduled concurrently (every 64ms in
>>>> this scenario).
>>>>
>>>> This issue is particularly seen on certain older AMD platforms.
>>>> To mitigate this problem, it is recommended to adjust the service
>>>> interval of the IN endpoint to not exceed 32ms (interval 8). This
>>>> adjustment ensures that the OUT endpoint will not be bypassed,
>>>> even if a smaller interval value is utilized.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
>>>
>>> You don't want this backported to any older kernels? Why not?
>>
>> Hi Greg, Yes, backporting is needed, but some of products were released back
>> in 2018, not sure of the exact commit id to quote here for backporting as
>> there were no precise commits that added this initial support in the first
>> place.
>>
>> Would you mind tagging it to all stable kernels. Let me know if the patch
>> needs to be respinned.
>
> Yes, please resend it with the proper tag, don't ask maintainers to
> hand-edit changes for you, that does not scale at all.
>
Sure, I'll re-spin with a stable tag.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 12:21 [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: quirk for data loss in ISOC transfers Raju Rangoju
2024-11-12 12:24 ` Greg KH
2024-11-12 13:32 ` Rangoju, Raju
2024-11-13 6:05 ` Greg KH
2024-11-13 6:11 ` Rangoju, Raju [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19452eb2-10e7-e90e-fdf0-19269d04e84c@amd.com \
--to=raju.rangoju@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox