From: Martin Maurer <martin.maurer@mmeacs.de>
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, michal.pecio@gmail.com,
mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: Problem hanging Bulk IN, with USB 3.x, perhaps due to wMaxPacketSize = 1024 and wMaxBurst = 6 (OUT) and 2 (IN), tested and reproduceable with i.MX8MP and Raspberry Pi Compute Module 5 (CM5)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:58:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b1391ef-b8f4-48bd-952c-0530ebc97be4@mmeacs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c13a7f8-647e-4199-b0e6-451128bdd61e@linux.intel.com>
Hello Michał, hello Mathias at all,
many thanks for your answers!
I have tried if I can reproduce it with a AMD Linux PC, but
unfortunately I was not able to reproduce (but setup is a bit different).
So I went back to Raspberry Pi Compute Module 5, where I mainly
connected the radio module (Quectel RM520N-GL) via USB3,
and installed a Wifi access point. All data/all connections from Wifi
access point are routed directly via wwan0 to radio module.
This is currently my easiest setup to be able to reproduce the error.
Mostly in a few seconds.
My knowledge in area Linux Kernel + USB is unfortunately not yet enough
to analyze and fix it by myself.
But I used the help of ChatGPT-5 to create an usbmon and xhci kernel trace.
I create an usbmon trace as well as a trace from xhci (both recorded in
parallel):
https://www.file-upload.net/en/download-15523936/usbmon_bus5_20250817-150158.log.html
https://www.file-upload.net/en/download-15523937/xhci_20250817-150158.trace.html
This was the last output, my ping in a shell has shown:
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2323 ttl=112 time=26.0 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2324 ttl=112 time=25.0 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2325 ttl=112 time=29.1 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2326 ttl=112 time=37.8 ms
In parallel created more data traffic, but with ping I see first when IP
data connection does not work stable anymore.
According to ChatGPT-5 the following places contain errors:
*** USBMON ***
In your usbmon_bus5_20250817-150158.log:
First -71 (EPROTO) on the QMI Bulk-IN (Bi:5:005:14): line 2161,
timestamp 493245744
2161: ffffff8003c8cb40 493245744 C Bi:5:005:14 -71 0
Just before that, there’s a -75 (EOVERFLOW) on the same IN EP, which is
often the first sign of trouble: line 2159, timestamp 493245221
2159: ffffff8003c8cd80 493245221 C Bi:5:005:14 -75 1024 = ...
So the sequence is: several good completions → EOVERFLOW (-75) → then a
stream of EPROTO (-71) errors on Bi:5:005:14, which kills further ping
replies after your last good seq (2326).
*** XHCI TRACE ***
I found the first failure in your xHCI trace.
First error line: line 8216
Timestamp: 758267.000115
Event: xhci_handle_event … type 'Transfer Event' … 'Error' … slot 1 ep
29 … len 1472
Why ep 29? In xHCI, the endpoint context index is ep_index = 2 *
ep_number + (direction), where direction is 0=OUT, 1=IN.
So for Bulk IN ep 14: 2*14+1 = 29 → that’s your IN 0x87 pipe.
Right after that line you can see the driver react:
xhci_handle_transfer … length 1472 … (the failed TD)
xhci_queue_command: Reset Endpoint Command … ep 29 (host tries to recover)
xhci_handle_event: … 'Command Completion Event' (reset completes)
But from this point on, completions for that IN EP correspond to usbmon
-71 (EPROTO) — matching what you saw.
Does this give a clue, where it could be coming from?
It is 100% reproduceable in a few seconds on Raspberry Pi Ccompute
Module 5 (and I same behaviour on different kernel of i.MX8MP).
Could it be a hardware problem? I already tried different radio module
(all Qualcomm, X62/X65 and X72/X75),
different cables (all same length, all from same source), different eval
board for the M.2 radio modules (but from same source).
Can you give me a hint, what to try next?
ChatGPT-5 pinpoints me to try to disable LPM for USB3, could this be a
next step? Or is it something else?
Many thanks for your help!
Best regards,
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-17 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 21:47 Problem hanging Bulk IN, with USB 3.x, perhaps due to wMaxPacketSize = 1024 and wMaxBurst = 6 (OUT) and 2 (IN), tested and reproduceable with i.MX8MP and Raspberry Pi Compute Module 5 (CM5) Martin Maurer
2025-08-14 12:16 ` Michał Pecio
2025-08-14 13:02 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-08-17 14:58 ` Martin Maurer [this message]
2025-08-17 15:07 ` Martin Maurer
2025-08-17 15:22 ` Daniele Palmas
2025-08-17 17:01 ` Martin Maurer
2025-08-18 19:49 ` Daniele Palmas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b1391ef-b8f4-48bd-952c-0530ebc97be4@mmeacs.de \
--to=martin.maurer@mmeacs.de \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox