From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: WARN: Success on ctrl setup TRB without IOC set??
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 10:35:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180224023557.GA14790@b29397-desktop> (raw)
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:39:28AM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 09.02.2018 04:03, Peter Chen wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:59:46AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:43:23PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> >>>On 07.02.2018 11:45, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>>>Hi Mathias,
> >>>>
> >>>>I am implementing USB2 EHSET SINGLE_STEP_SET_FEATURE Test for XHCI port,
> >>>>(see ehset_single_step_set_feature for EHCI), it needs to set IOC
> >>>>for setup packet, and software waits 15 seconds before DATA + STATUS stage.
> >>>>After porting such design for XHCI, it triggers above warning, and
> >>>>returns -ESHUTDOWN for URB. Any reasons why we don't allow completion
> >>>>interrupt for SETUP stage? Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Current xhci driver control transfer implementation doesn't support
> >>>queuing a control transfer in parts. we set the IOC only for the status
> >>>stage, and we always queue a status stage (and possibly data stage) automatically
> >>>when queuing a control transfer URB.
> >>>
> >>>If we get a success event for the SETUP stage the driver will finish the TD and
> >>>return the whole URB.
> >>>
> >>>For testing purposes you would need to make sure we don't call finish_td() for
> >>>a success event at the SETUP stage, something like this (untested):
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >>>index c5cbc68..f6d005e 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >>>@@ -2014,12 +2014,8 @@ static int process_ctrl_td(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_td *td,
> >>> switch (trb_comp_code) {
> >>> case COMP_SUCCESS:
> >>>- if (trb_type != TRB_STATUS) {
> >>>- xhci_warn(xhci, "WARN: Success on ctrl %s TRB without IOC set?\n",
> >>>- (trb_type == TRB_DATA) ? "data" : "setup");
> >>>- *status = -ESHUTDOWN;
> >>>- break;
> >>>- }
> >>>+ if (trb_type == TRB_SETUP)
> >>>+ return 0;
> >>> *status = 0;
> >>> break;
> >>> case COMP_SHORT_PACKET:
> >>>
> >>
> >>Thanks, Mathias. I need to call finish_td since it needs to
> >>giveback and cleanup URB. And I see below code at process_ctrl_td,
> >>why we can't call it? In fact, I only see warning message, but
> >>without any errors for transactions. How about only delete message
> >>or change debug level as xhci_dbg?
> >
> >Should be "or change debug message level and *status value as zero."
> >
>
Sorry to reply late due to New Year holiday at China.
> Ah, ok, I thought you didn't want to give back the URB before the STATUS stage.
>
No, I want to give back the URB after SETUP has finished.
The whole process for test includes below steps:
- Prepare the 1st URB for SETUP
- After the 1st URB is given back, wait 15s.
- Prepare the 2nd URB for DATA + STATUS
- The 2nd URB needs to be given back.
> Note that If you call finish_td on a successful SETUP stage it will give back the
> entire URB, and move the software dequeue pointer past the STATUS stage TRB.
> So software and hardware dequeue pointers are out of sync.
> If IOC is then set on DATA or STATUS stage TRB the driver will complain about
> either
> "WARN Event TRB for slot %d ep %d with no TDs queued?"
> or
> "ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ..."
> as it thinks all TRBs of this TD are handled and already moved past all them.
I did not meet above errors, I use two URBs for SETUP and DATA + STATUS.
>
> Using xhci_dbg() instead of xhci_warn works for me
>
How about below changes?
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index daa94c3..837af86 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -2010,12 +2010,9 @@ static int process_ctrl_td(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_td *td,
switch (trb_comp_code) {
case COMP_SUCCESS:
- if (trb_type != TRB_STATUS) {
- xhci_warn(xhci, "WARN: Success on ctrl %s TRB without IOC set?\n",
+ if (trb_type != TRB_STATUS)
+ xhci_dbg(xhci, "on ctrl %s TRB without IOC set?\n",
(trb_type == TRB_DATA) ? "data" : "setup");
- *status = -ESHUTDOWN;
- break;
- }
*status = 0;
break;
case COMP_SHORT_PACKET:
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-24 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-24 2:35 Peter Chen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-09 9:39 WARN: Success on ctrl setup TRB without IOC set?? Mathias Nyman
2018-02-09 2:03 Peter Chen
2018-02-09 1:59 Peter Chen
2018-02-07 13:43 Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180224023557.GA14790@b29397-desktop \
--to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).