linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
Cc: johan@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [v1,1/1] USB: serial: Add boundry check for read_urbs array access
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 12:58:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180307205840.GA6242@kroah.com> (raw)

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0800, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> 
> In usb_serial_generic_submit_read_urb() function we are accessing the
> port->read_urbs array without any boundry checks. This might lead to
> kernel panic when index value goes above array length.
> 
> One posible call path for this issue is,
> 
> usb_serial_generic_read_bulk_callback()
> {
>  ...
>  if (!port->throttled) {
> 	usb_serial_generic_submit_read_urb(port, i, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  ...
> }

How does i ever get to be greater than the array size here in this
function?  It directly came from looking in that array in the first
place :)

So I don't see why your check is needed, what other code path would ever
call this function in a way that the bounds check would be needed?

thanks,

greg k-h
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2018-03-07 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-07 20:58 Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-09  0:34 [v1,1/1] USB: serial: Add boundry check for read_urbs array access sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2018-03-08 23:43 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-03-08 23:29 sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2018-03-08 14:01 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-03-08  8:54 Oliver Neukum
2018-03-07 21:41 sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2018-03-07 20:23 sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180307205840.GA6242@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).