From: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: kbuild@01.org, kbuild-all@01.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [09/11] usb: musb: break the huge isr musb_stage0_irq() into small functions
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 08:33:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180418133352.GD14921@uda0271908> (raw)
Hi Dan,
I appreciate you scaning the patches and reporting the issues.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:25:34AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on balbi-usb/next]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc1 next-20180417]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bin-Liu/usb-musb-cleanup/20180417-133633
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git next
>
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:797 musb_handle_intr_connect() error: we previously assumed 'musb->hcd' could be null (see line 783)
It appears the condition check was introduced back in 2013 in an attempt
to separate host-only and gadget-only configurations for musb [1], but it
seems the work is not complete, because the musb->hcd allocation is
unconditional. So in the current code, musb->hcd won't be NULL.
But I am now hesitated to remove this 'if(musb->hcd)' check to solve
this smatch warning, because I am still debating on either continue the
work to separate the two configurations or clean up the uncompleted code
left by the attempt to not separate them.
So I want to leave the patch as is for now, is it reasonable?
[1] commit 74c2e93600581("usb: musb: factor out hcd initalization")
Regards,
-Bin.
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-18 13:33 Bin Liu [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-18 14:22 [09/11] usb: musb: break the huge isr musb_stage0_irq() into small functions Bin Liu
2018-04-18 14:14 Dan Carpenter
2018-04-18 7:25 Dan Carpenter
2018-04-16 19:15 Bin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180418133352.GD14921@uda0271908 \
--to=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=kbuild@01.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).