From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Subject: [02/22] USB: typec: fsusb302: no need to check return value of debugfs_create_dir()
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 09:45:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180529164545.GC2162@roeck-us.net> (raw)
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 06:27:03PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:15:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 05:30:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > > never do something different based on this.
> > >
> > > Clean up the fsusb302 driver to not care about the dentry being created,
> > > or if the root directory was created, as the code should work properly
> > > either way. We do not need to save the dentry anymore as things are
> > > properly cleaned up when we remove the root directory.
> > >
> > > Note, this driver seems to only work for one device per system,
> > > otherwise the debugfs directories are going to get confused when a
> > > device is removed.
> > >
> > > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > > Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/typec/fusb302/fusb302.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/fusb302/fusb302.c b/drivers/usb/typec/fusb302/fusb302.c
> > > index 9c1eba9ea004..07b07ddf6af0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/fusb302/fusb302.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/fusb302/fusb302.c
> > > @@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ struct fusb302_chip {
> > > u32 snk_pdo[PDO_MAX_OBJECTS];
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > > - struct dentry *dentry;
> > > /* lock for log buffer access */
> > > struct mutex logbuffer_lock;
> > > int logbuffer_head;
> > > @@ -215,33 +214,26 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(fusb302_debug);
> > >
> > > static struct dentry *rootdir;
> > >
> > > -static int fusb302_debugfs_init(struct fusb302_chip *chip)
> > > +static void fusb302_debugfs_init(struct fusb302_chip *chip)
> > > {
> > > mutex_init(&chip->logbuffer_lock);
> > > - if (!rootdir) {
> > > + if (!rootdir)
> > > rootdir = debugfs_create_dir("fusb302", NULL);
> > > - if (!rootdir)
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - chip->dentry = debugfs_create_file(dev_name(chip->dev),
> > > - S_IFREG | 0444, rootdir,
> > > - chip, &fusb302_debug_fops);
> > >
> > > - return 0;
> > > + debugfs_create_file(dev_name(chip->dev), S_IFREG | 0444, rootdir, chip,
> > > + &fusb302_debug_fops);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void fusb302_debugfs_exit(struct fusb302_chip *chip)
> > > {
> > > - debugfs_remove(chip->dentry);
> > > - debugfs_remove(rootdir);
> > > + debugfs_remove_recursive(rootdir);
> >
> > The idea was that debugfs_remove() would only remove the root directory
> > if nothing else was in it. This was the reason for the preceding
> > debugfs_remove(chip->dentry) followed by debugfs_remove(). Your patch
> > changes this behavior. "... this driver seems to only work for one
> > device per system" is introduced by your patch and was not previously
> > the case.
>
> Ah, that makes more sense. Nice hack :)
>
> Why not just have a new directory per device like "most" drivers have?
> That would make this a bit simpler to manage. Mind of I change the code
> that way? Hm, you still end up having to save off a dentry that way,
> ah, it's the same either way...
>
I personally prefer some kind of grouping, such as done for regulators.
Of course, that is easier if there is a subsystem behind it. No strong
opinion either way. And, yes, you'll still need to store dentry somewhere
to be able to remove it.
Guenter
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-29 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-29 16:45 Guenter Roeck [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-29 16:27 [02/22] USB: typec: fsusb302: no need to check return value of debugfs_create_dir() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-29 16:15 Guenter Roeck
2018-05-29 15:30 Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180529164545.GC2162@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).