linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
	kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, b-liu@ti.com, rogerq@ti.com,
	balbi@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [v5,4/6] usb: gadget: add mechanism to specify an explicit status stage
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 03:23:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190111082340.GB32268@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:06:31PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Paul Elder wrote:
> 
> > A usb gadget function driver may or may not want to delay the status
> > stage of a control OUT request. An instance where it might want to is to
> > asynchronously validate the data of a class-specific request.
> > 
> > A function driver that wants an explicit status stage should set the
> > newly added explicit_status flag of the usb_request corresponding to the
> > data stage. Later on, the function driver can explicitly complete the
> > status stage by enqueueing a usb_request for ACK, or calling
> > usb_ep_set_halt() for STALL.
> > 
> > To support both explicit and implicit status stages, a UDC driver must
> > call the newly added usb_gadget_control_complete function right before
> > calling usb_gadget_giveback_request. To support the explicit status
> > stage, it might then check what stage the usb_request was queued in, and
> > for control IN ACK the host's zero-length data packet, or for control
> > OUT send a zero-length DATA1 ACK packet.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
> > v4 Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> > v1 Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> 
> This looks good and has passed my tests so far.

Good! Thank you :)

> Can you check your uvc
> changes using dummy_hcd with the patch below?

I'm not sure what to make of the test results. I get the same results
with or without the patch. Which I guess makes sense... in dummy_queue,
this is getting hit when the uvc function driver tries to complete the
delayed status:

	req = usb_request_to_dummy_request(_req);
	if (!_req || !list_empty(&req->queue) || !_req->complete)
		return -EINVAL;

So the delayed/explicit status stage is never completed, afaict.

Paul

             reply	other threads:[~2019-01-11  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-11  8:23 Paul Elder [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-24  2:48 [v5,4/6] usb: gadget: add mechanism to specify an explicit status stage Paul Elder
2019-01-23 21:10 Alan Stern
2019-01-20 17:59 Paul Elder
2019-01-18 16:52 Alan Stern
2019-01-18 16:31 Paul Elder
2019-01-16 15:06 Alan Stern
2019-01-16  5:00 Paul Elder
2019-01-14 15:24 Alan Stern
2019-01-14  5:11 Paul Elder
2019-01-11 15:50 Alan Stern
2019-01-09 19:06 Alan Stern
2019-01-09  7:08 Paul Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190111082340.GB32268@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=paul.elder@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=b-liu@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).