From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Karoly Pados <pados@pados.hu>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: USB: serial: cp210x: Fix GPIO in autosuspend
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:26:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190115092607.GN3691@localhost> (raw)
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 09:17:58AM +0000, Karoly Pados wrote:
> > I think it's better to add the autopm call to gpio210x_gpio_get/set
> > only. This will allow for a simpler patch, and keeps the autopm handling
> > confined to the gpio paths.
>
> I'll submit a v2.
>
> >> @@ -1383,6 +1397,7 @@ static void cp210x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int
> >> value)
> >> } else {
> >> u16 wIndex = buf.state << 8 | buf.mask;
> >>
> >> + usb_autopm_get_interface(serial->interface);
> >
> > Also make sure to always check for errors from autopm_get().
>
> I checked everywhere else, the reason I didn't check here is on
> purpose based on your previous feedback. The caller function here
> doesn't have a return value, so the only way to return errors is to
> log, but in my last patch to ftdi_sio you made clear that errors from
> autopm_get shouldn't get logged. Trying to call usb_control_msg() even
> though the device could not wake does not cause issues, and the return
> value from usb_control_msg() clearly identifies the reason for failure
> (failure due to autosuspend), so error information is not lost either.
> So I thought not checking here has no real disadvantage and I still
> stay conformant to your previous guidance.
Ok, I understand your reasoning, but please do check for errors and bail
out early if autopm_get() fails. No need to log errors.
Thanks,
Johan
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-15 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-15 9:26 Johan Hovold [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-07 13:57 USB: serial: cp210x: Fix GPIO in autosuspend Johan Hovold
2019-02-06 21:43 Karoly Pados
2019-02-04 16:09 Johan Hovold
2019-01-15 10:29 Johan Hovold
2019-01-15 9:17 Karoly Pados
2019-01-15 8:57 Johan Hovold
2019-01-14 19:43 Karoly Pados
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190115092607.GN3691@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pados@pados.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).