From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
Subject: [v2] leds: fix regression in usbport led trigger
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190118092834.GA19847@kroah.com> (raw)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:22:02AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:13:37AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:07:05AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > But I still agree that there seems to be something "unusual" about the
> > > usb led trigger ...
> > >
> > > Instead of providing a sysfs-file per port to make said port trigger the
> > > led, I'd prefer a single file that you can use to add and remove ports
> > > from the trigger. With this change the driver can properly benefit from
> > > the attribute handling of the led-trigger core and is more in line with
> > > the other triggers.
> >
> > But how do you know how many ports are present? And this feels like it
> > ends up being a "custom api" for each different type of led that is
>
> I assume you mean "different type of led trigger" here. (For leds that
> is not true.)
>
> > present in the system. Or is that already the case?
>
> I imagine something like:
>
> # cat available_ports
> port1 port2 port3
>
> # cat active_ports
> port1
>
> # echo port2 > active_ports
> # cat active_ports
> port1 port2
>
> Regarding the "custom API" point: Sure, it's not possible to entirely
> prevent this as an UART trigger is about UARTs and an USB trigger is
> about USB ports. We could argue about a callback that somehow enumerates
> possible trigger sources, but I'm not sure this simplifies stuff in the
> end because there are still some special cases. E.g. you might want to
> have the UART trigger only blink on TX for ttyS2.
But, the trigger is on the specific ttyS2 device, so keeping it on the
individual port devices makes a lot of sense. sysfs should be
one-value-per-file where ever possible.
thanks,
greg k-h
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 9:28 Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-18 9:44 [v2] leds: fix regression in usbport led trigger Uwe Kleine-König
2019-01-18 9:22 Uwe Kleine-König
2019-01-18 9:13 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-18 9:07 Uwe Kleine-König
2019-01-18 8:56 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-11 16:29 Christian Lamparter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190118092834.GA19847@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chunkeey@gmail.com \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).