* [2/8] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding
@ 2019-01-16 9:57 Nicolas Ferre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2019-01-16 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Belloni, Ludovic Desroches
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Sebastian Reichel, linux-pm,
netdev, David S . Miller, linux-usb, Alan Stern,
Greg Kroah-Hartman, Rob Herring, devicetree, Nicolas Ferre
Update the Reset Controller's binding to add new SoC compatibility string.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
index 36952cc39993..badce6ef3ab3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Its subnodes can be:
RSTC Reset Controller required properties:
- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-rstc".
<chip> can be "at91sam9260", "at91sam9g45", "sama5d3" or "samx7"
+ it also can be "microchip,sam9x60-rstc"
- reg: Should contain registers location and length
- clocks: phandle to input clock.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [2/8] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding
@ 2019-01-22 1:07 Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-01-22 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Ferre
Cc: Alexandre Belloni, Ludovic Desroches, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Sebastian Reichel, linux-pm, netdev,
David S . Miller, linux-usb, Alan Stern, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
devicetree
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Update the Reset Controller's binding to add new SoC compatibility string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> index 36952cc39993..badce6ef3ab3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Its subnodes can be:
> RSTC Reset Controller required properties:
> - compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-rstc".
> <chip> can be "at91sam9260", "at91sam9g45", "sama5d3" or "samx7"
> + it also can be "microchip,sam9x60-rstc"
How is this related to at91sam9260-rstc?
The 'x' is a wildcard? We generally avoid wildcards.
> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
> - clocks: phandle to input clock.
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [2/8] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding
@ 2019-01-22 9:00 Nicolas Ferre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2019-01-22 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh
Cc: alexandre.belloni, Ludovic.Desroches, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, sre, linux-pm, netdev, davem, linux-usb, stern,
gregkh, devicetree
Hi Rob,
On 22/01/2019 at 02:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Update the Reset Controller's binding to add new SoC compatibility string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
>> index 36952cc39993..badce6ef3ab3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Its subnodes can be:
>> RSTC Reset Controller required properties:
>> - compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-rstc".
>> <chip> can be "at91sam9260", "at91sam9g45", "sama5d3" or "samx7"
>> + it also can be "microchip,sam9x60-rstc"
>
> How is this related to at91sam9260-rstc?
at91sam9260 and sam9x60 are completely different products (they share
the same core though...). I know the naming could be misleading but it
is like it is...
> The 'x' is a wildcard? We generally avoid wildcards.
Here, the 'x' is definitively not a wildcard nor a kind of "family"
name, it's included in the (upcoming) single product's name.
I hope it clarifies.
Best regards,
Nicolas
>> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>> - clocks: phandle to input clock.
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [2/8] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding
@ 2019-01-22 13:40 Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-01-22 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Ferre
Cc: Alexandre Belloni, Ludovic Desroches,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
Sebastian Reichel, open list:THERMAL, netdev, David Miller,
Linux USB List, Alan Stern, Greg Kroah-Hartman, devicetree
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:00 AM <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 22/01/2019 at 02:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> Update the Reset Controller's binding to add new SoC compatibility string.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> >> index 36952cc39993..badce6ef3ab3 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Its subnodes can be:
> >> RSTC Reset Controller required properties:
> >> - compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-rstc".
> >> <chip> can be "at91sam9260", "at91sam9g45", "sama5d3" or "samx7"
> >> + it also can be "microchip,sam9x60-rstc"
> >
> > How is this related to at91sam9260-rstc?
>
> at91sam9260 and sam9x60 are completely different products (they share
> the same core though...). I know the naming could be misleading but it
> is like it is...
>
> > The 'x' is a wildcard? We generally avoid wildcards.
>
> Here, the 'x' is definitively not a wildcard nor a kind of "family"
> name, it's included in the (upcoming) single product's name.
>
> I hope it clarifies.
Yes, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-22 13:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-22 1:07 [2/8] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding Rob Herring
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-22 13:40 Rob Herring
2019-01-22 9:00 Nicolas Ferre
2019-01-16 9:57 Nicolas Ferre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).