[v4,1/5] usb: split code locating ACPI companion into port and device

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:42:26PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:29 PM Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marcel,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rajat,
> > >
> > > > In preparation for handling embedded USB devices let's split
> > > > usb_acpi_find_companion() into usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device() and
> > > > usb_acpi_find_companion_for_port().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > Tested-by: Sukumar Ghorai <sukumar.ghorai@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v4: Add Acked-by and Tested-by in signatures.
> > > > v3: same as v1
> > > > v2: same as v1
> > > >
> > > > drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > what is the plan here? I take this via bluetooth-next tree?
> >
> > Yes, I'd think that would be the best plan. Dmitry / Greg - do you
> > have any objections / suggestions?
> 
> That's up to Greg, but since he'd acked the patches I'd assume he's OK
> with taking it through bluetooth. As an option Marcel could cut an
> immutable branch off 4.20 with the first 2 patches so that he and Greg
> can both pull it into their main branches and then git will do the
> right thing when Linus pulls from them. Lee uses quite a bit of them
> in MFD and other maintainers are known to occasionally make them for
> work that needs to be shared between trees.

I don't need to take these, they can all go through one tree, which is
why I gave my ack to the patch.

thanks,

greg k-h