From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: usb: typec: tcpm: Try PD-2.0 if sink does not respond to 3.0 source-caps
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 07:57:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190315145736.GA32293@roeck-us.net> (raw)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> PD 2.0 sinks are supposed to accept src-capabilities with a 3.0 header and
> simply ignore any src PDOs which the sink does not understand such as PPS
> but some 2.0 sinks instead ignore the entire PD_DATA_SOURCE_CAP message,
> causing contract negotiation to fail.
>
> This commit fixes such sinks not working by re-trying the contract
> negotiation with PD-2.0 source-caps messages if we don't have a contract
> after PD_N_HARD_RESET_COUNT hard-reset attempts.
>
> The problem fixed by this commit was noticed with a Type-C to VGA dongle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
> The Type-C to VGA dongle on which this encountered looks like this one:
> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/Male-USB-3-1-Type-C-USB-C-to-Female-VGA-Adapter-Cable-10Gbps-for-New/32898274476.html
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index f1c39a3c7534..3f8df845d1a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> S(SRC_ATTACHED), \
> S(SRC_STARTUP), \
> S(SRC_SEND_CAPABILITIES), \
> + S(SRC_SEND_CAP_LOWER_PD_REVISION), \
> S(SRC_NEGOTIATE_CAPABILITIES), \
> S(SRC_TRANSITION_SUPPLY), \
> S(SRC_READY), \
> @@ -2792,6 +2793,29 @@ static inline enum tcpm_state hard_reset_state(struct tcpm_port *port)
> return SNK_UNATTACHED;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * PD 2.0 sinks are supposed to accept src-capabilities with a 3.0 header and
> + * simply ignore any src PDOs which the sink does not understand such as PPS
> + * but some 2.0 sinks instead ignore the entire PD_DATA_SOURCE_CAP message,
> + * causing contract negotiation to fail.
> + *
> + * This function is used by the SRC_SEND_CAPABILITIES state in
> + * run_state_machine() to work around this.
> + *
> + * After PD_N_HARD_RESET_COUNT hard-reset attempts this function selects
> + * SRC_SEND_CAP_LOWER_PD_REVISION as state to set after the next timeout,
> + * this state will fallback to a lower PD revision and then try sending the
> + * src-capabilities again.
> + */
> +static inline enum tcpm_state src_send_cap_timeout_state(struct tcpm_port *port)
> +{
> + if (port->hard_reset_count < PD_N_HARD_RESET_COUNT)
> + return HARD_RESET_SEND;
> + if (port->negotiated_rev > PD_REV20)
> + return SRC_SEND_CAP_LOWER_PD_REVISION;
> + return hard_reset_state(port);
> +}
> +
> static inline enum tcpm_state unattached_state(struct tcpm_port *port)
> {
> if (port->port_type == TYPEC_PORT_DRP) {
> @@ -2966,10 +2990,18 @@ static void run_state_machine(struct tcpm_port *port)
> /* port->hard_reset_count = 0; */
> port->caps_count = 0;
> port->pd_capable = true;
> - tcpm_set_state_cond(port, hard_reset_state(port),
> + tcpm_set_state_cond(port,
> + src_send_cap_timeout_state(port),
> PD_T_SEND_SOURCE_CAP);
> }
> break;
> + case SRC_SEND_CAP_LOWER_PD_REVISION:
> + if (WARN_ON(port->negotiated_rev <= PD_REV20))
> + break;
I really dislike the WARN_ON here. A bad remote can potentially trigger
this, which on systems with crash on warning enabled can result in a
reboot. Just revert to the original behavior here, and maybe add
a tcpm log message.
Guenter
> + port->negotiated_rev--;
> + port->hard_reset_count = 0;
> + tcpm_set_state(port, SRC_SEND_CAPABILITIES, 0);
> + break;
> case SRC_NEGOTIATE_CAPABILITIES:
> ret = tcpm_pd_check_request(port);
> if (ret < 0) {
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-15 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 14:57 Guenter Roeck [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-16 13:58 usb: typec: tcpm: Try PD-2.0 if sink does not respond to 3.0 source-caps Hans de Goede
2019-03-15 16:53 Guenter Roeck
2019-03-15 16:43 Hans de Goede
2019-03-15 14:42 Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190315145736.GA32293@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).