From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [v2] USB: serial: io_edgeport: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 12:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502102608.GS26546@localhost> (raw)
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:33:29PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c: In function ‘process_rcvd_data’:
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1750:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (bufferLength == 0) {
> ^
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1755:3: note: here
> case EXPECT_HDR2:
> ^~~~
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1810:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (bufferLength == 0) {
> ^
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1816:3: note: here
> case EXPECT_DATA: /* Expect data */
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comments are modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Warning level 3 is now used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> instead of warning level 2.
> - All warnings in the switch statement are addressed now.
>
> Notice that these are the last remaining fall-through warnings
> in the USB subsystem. :)
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c b/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c
> index 4ca31c0e4174..7ad10328f4e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c
> @@ -1751,7 +1751,7 @@ static void process_rcvd_data(struct edgeport_serial *edge_serial,
> edge_serial->rxState = EXPECT_HDR2;
> break;
> }
> - /* otherwise, drop on through */
> + /* Fall through - otherwise, drop on through */
> case EXPECT_HDR2:
> edge_serial->rxHeader2 = *buffer;
> ++buffer;
> @@ -1813,6 +1813,7 @@ static void process_rcvd_data(struct edgeport_serial *edge_serial,
> }
> /* Else, drop through */
> }
> + /* Fall through */
> case EXPECT_DATA: /* Expect data */
Looks like you forgot to take the original review feedback you got into
account:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87k1zf4k24.fsf@miraculix.mork.no
Johan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB: serial: io_edgeport: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 12:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502102608.GS26546@localhost> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190502102608.WeMjK3NsA4hKOvlD3a_u5Ky0VllP70U0tzOEx7gB6kk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190501213329.GA26972@embeddedor>
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:33:29PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c: In function ‘process_rcvd_data’:
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1750:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (bufferLength == 0) {
> ^
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1755:3: note: here
> case EXPECT_HDR2:
> ^~~~
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1810:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (bufferLength == 0) {
> ^
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:1816:3: note: here
> case EXPECT_DATA: /* Expect data */
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comments are modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Warning level 3 is now used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> instead of warning level 2.
> - All warnings in the switch statement are addressed now.
>
> Notice that these are the last remaining fall-through warnings
> in the USB subsystem. :)
> drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c b/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c
> index 4ca31c0e4174..7ad10328f4e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c
> @@ -1751,7 +1751,7 @@ static void process_rcvd_data(struct edgeport_serial *edge_serial,
> edge_serial->rxState = EXPECT_HDR2;
> break;
> }
> - /* otherwise, drop on through */
> + /* Fall through - otherwise, drop on through */
> case EXPECT_HDR2:
> edge_serial->rxHeader2 = *buffer;
> ++buffer;
> @@ -1813,6 +1813,7 @@ static void process_rcvd_data(struct edgeport_serial *edge_serial,
> }
> /* Else, drop through */
> }
> + /* Fall through */
> case EXPECT_DATA: /* Expect data */
Looks like you forgot to take the original review feedback you got into
account:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87k1zf4k24.fsf@miraculix.mork.no
Johan
next prev reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-01 21:33 [v2] USB: serial: io_edgeport: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-01 21:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-02 10:26 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2019-05-02 10:26 ` Johan Hovold
2019-05-02 13:22 ` [v2] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-02 13:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-02 13:56 ` [v2] " Johan Hovold
2019-05-02 13:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Johan Hovold
2019-05-02 14:28 ` [v2] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-02 14:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-02 14:40 ` [v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-02 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-02 14:47 ` [v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-02 14:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-02 14:57 ` [v2] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-02 14:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-05-02 15:04 ` [v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-02 15:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-02 15:14 ` [v2] " Johan Hovold
2019-05-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Johan Hovold
2019-05-02 14:48 ` [v2] " Johan Hovold
2019-05-02 14:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190502102608.GS26546@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).