linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com, hch@lst.de, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	marex@denx.de, leoyang.li@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:53:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510155335.GA32010@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6410453-9ca3-4bdc-3c74-654333f2806f@arm.com>

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 04:03:37PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Laurentiu,
>
> On 10/05/2019 15:56,  wrote:
>> From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
>>
>> For HCs that have local memory, replace the current DMA API usage
>> with a genalloc generic allocator to manage the mappings for these
>> devices.
>> This is in preparation for dropping the existing "coherent" dma
>> mem declaration APIs. Current implementation was relying on a short
>> circuit in the DMA API that in the end, was acting as an allocator
>> for these type of devices.
>>
>> Only compiled tested, so any volunteers willing to test are most welcome.
>
> Based on my diggings into this in the past, I would expect that you need to 
> do something about hcd_alloc_coherent() as well.

Yep.  And it might make sense to share the code for that and the
ohci internal allocations with a helper.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-10 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-10 14:56 [RFC PATCH 0/3] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-10 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] ohci-hcd: use genalloc for USB HCs with local memory laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-10 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] usb: host: ohci-sm501: init genalloc for " laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-10 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] usb: host: ohci-tmio: " laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-10 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework Robin Murphy
2019-05-10 15:12   ` Laurentiu Tudor
2019-05-10 15:53   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190510155335.GA32010@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).