linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"balbi@kernel.org" <balbi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Aspeed vhub configuration
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:24:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190702122430.GC12019@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44bb150fb8b283a3036a382fa7e821b045554c15.camel@kernel.crashing.org>

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:33:11PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi folks !
> 
> The Aspeed USB gadget "vhub" implements a hub emulation with a number
> of UDCs representing the hub slots. It's working ok now and has been
> upstream for a bit, however, one thing that's been annoying to some
> users is that I've just hard coded the hub's device descriptor. IE, the
> vendor/product ID, strings etc...
> 
> Various BMC SW stack vendors want to customize that, also possibly the
> number of ports etc...
> 
> I originally thought about configfs but after more thoughts I don't
> think it's really a good fit. The vhub is a fixed thing. When you have
> the HW, you have that hub, it's not like you can create different
> things, and populate differently.
> 
> That leaves me with two approaches, that aren't mutually exclusive, but
> I'd like to run them past the folks here before I start coding:
> 
>  - The defaults, currently hard coded, could be replaced with Kconfig
> options.
> 
>  - The device-tree node could contain optional override of those
> defaults, allowing a vendor to customize the hub for a given board.
> It's not per-se a HW description, but the device-tree is also fairly
> commonly used for HW configuration, even if some people disagree with
> me on that one (hint: they are wrong :-)
> 
>  - I could add sysfs properties underneath the vhub device instance to
> customize it. This would also allow userspace to control whether the
> hub is "connected" to the host or not, which could be useful, some
> systems don't want it to always be there. Today there's no choice.
> 
> Any other option ? If somebody says netlink I will scream :)

DT seems like the logical choice, I'll not object to that.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-02 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-02 11:33 Aspeed vhub configuration Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-02 12:24 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-07-02 12:29   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-02 12:56     ` Felipe Balbi
2019-07-02 13:10       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-03  6:24         ` Felipe Balbi
2019-07-03 22:52           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190702122430.GC12019@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).