linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	groeck@chromium.org, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: do not sleep when opening device
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:33:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529203324.GL89269@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529201424.GA180211@roeck-us.net>

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:14:24PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:59:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > usbhid tries to give the device 50 milliseconds to drain its queues
> > when opening the device, but does it naively by simply sleeping in open
> > handler, which slows down device probing (and thus may affect overall
> > boot time).
> > 
> > However we do not need to sleep as we can instead mark a point of time
> > in the future when we should start processing the events.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> >  drivers/hid/usbhid/usbhid.h   |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> > index c7bc9db5b192..e69992e945b2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> > @@ -95,6 +95,19 @@ static int hid_start_in(struct hid_device *hid)
> >  				set_bit(HID_NO_BANDWIDTH, &usbhid->iofl);
> >  		} else {
> >  			clear_bit(HID_NO_BANDWIDTH, &usbhid->iofl);
> > +
> > +			if (test_and_clear_bit(HID_RESUME_RUNNING,
> > +					       &usbhid->iofl)) {
> > +				/*
> > +				 * In case events are generated while nobody was
> > +				 * listening, some are released when the device
> > +				 * is re-opened. Wait 50 msec for the queue to
> > +				 * empty before allowing events to go through
> > +				 * hid.
> > +				 */
> > +				usbhid->input_start_time = jiffies +
> > +							   msecs_to_jiffies(50);
> > +			}
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&usbhid->lock, flags);
> > @@ -280,7 +293,8 @@ static void hid_irq_in(struct urb *urb)
> >  		if (!test_bit(HID_OPENED, &usbhid->iofl))
> >  			break;
> >  		usbhid_mark_busy(usbhid);
> > -		if (!test_bit(HID_RESUME_RUNNING, &usbhid->iofl)) {
> > +		if (!test_bit(HID_RESUME_RUNNING, &usbhid->iofl) &&
> > +		    time_after(jiffies, usbhid->input_start_time)) {
> >  			hid_input_report(urb->context, HID_INPUT_REPORT,
> >  					 urb->transfer_buffer,
> >  					 urb->actual_length, 1);
> > @@ -714,17 +728,6 @@ static int usbhid_open(struct hid_device *hid)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	usb_autopm_put_interface(usbhid->intf);
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * In case events are generated while nobody was listening,
> > -	 * some are released when the device is re-opened.
> > -	 * Wait 50 msec for the queue to empty before allowing events
> > -	 * to go through hid.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (res == 0)
> > -		msleep(50);
> > -
> Can you just set usbhid->input_start_time here ?
> 	if (res == 0)
> 		usbhid->input_start_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50);
> 	clear_bit(HID_RESUME_RUNNING, &usbhid->iofl);
> 
> Then you might not need the added code in hid_start_in().

That was my first version, but if hid_start_in() fails we start a timer
and try to retry the IO (and the "res" in 0 in this case). And we want
to mark the time only after we successfully submitted the interrupt URB,
that is why the code is in hid_start_in().

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-29 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-29 19:59 [PATCH] HID: usbhid: do not sleep when opening device Dmitry Torokhov
2020-05-29 20:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-29 20:33   ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2020-05-29 20:44     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-29 23:50 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-05-30  0:48   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-30  1:09     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-05-30  1:22       ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-30  1:34         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-06-01 17:13           ` Jiri Kosina
2020-06-02  9:14             ` Benjamin Tissoires

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200529203324.GL89269@dtor-ws \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).