From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/27] xhci: dbc: Don't use generic xhci erst allocation and free functions
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:45:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200723144530.9992-5-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200723144530.9992-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
The generic erst allocation and free functions take struct xhci_hcd pointer
as a parameter. Create own erst helpers for DbC in order to decouple xhci
and DbC
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.c
index 424b571d6ca9..138b0c994ad2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.c
@@ -370,12 +370,36 @@ static void xhci_dbc_eps_exit(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
memset(dbc->eps, 0, sizeof(struct dbc_ep) * ARRAY_SIZE(dbc->eps));
}
+static int dbc_erst_alloc(struct device *dev, struct xhci_ring *evt_ring,
+ struct xhci_erst *erst, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ erst->entries = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, sizeof(struct xhci_erst_entry),
+ &erst->erst_dma_addr, flags);
+ if (!erst->entries)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ erst->num_entries = 1;
+ erst->entries[0].seg_addr = cpu_to_le64(evt_ring->first_seg->dma);
+ erst->entries[0].seg_size = cpu_to_le32(TRBS_PER_SEGMENT);
+ erst->entries[0].rsvd = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void dbc_erst_free(struct device *dev, struct xhci_erst *erst)
+{
+ if (erst->entries)
+ dma_free_coherent(dev, sizeof(struct xhci_erst_entry),
+ erst->entries, erst->erst_dma_addr);
+ erst->entries = NULL;
+}
+
static int xhci_dbc_mem_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
{
int ret;
dma_addr_t deq;
u32 string_length;
struct xhci_dbc *dbc = xhci->dbc;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
/* Allocate various rings for events and transfers: */
dbc->ring_evt = xhci_ring_alloc(xhci, 1, 1, TYPE_EVENT, 0, flags);
@@ -391,7 +415,7 @@ static int xhci_dbc_mem_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
goto out_fail;
/* Allocate and populate ERST: */
- ret = xhci_alloc_erst(xhci, dbc->ring_evt, &dbc->erst, flags);
+ ret = dbc_erst_alloc(dev, dbc->ring_evt, &dbc->erst, flags);
if (ret)
goto erst_fail;
@@ -429,7 +453,7 @@ static int xhci_dbc_mem_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
xhci_free_container_ctx(xhci, dbc->ctx);
dbc->ctx = NULL;
ctx_fail:
- xhci_free_erst(xhci, &dbc->erst);
+ dbc_erst_free(dev, &dbc->erst);
erst_fail:
xhci_ring_free(xhci, dbc->ring_out);
dbc->ring_out = NULL;
@@ -446,6 +470,7 @@ static int xhci_dbc_mem_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
static void xhci_dbc_mem_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
struct xhci_dbc *dbc = xhci->dbc;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
if (!dbc)
return;
@@ -462,7 +487,7 @@ static void xhci_dbc_mem_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
xhci_free_container_ctx(xhci, dbc->ctx);
dbc->ctx = NULL;
- xhci_free_erst(xhci, &dbc->erst);
+ dbc_erst_free(dev, &dbc->erst);
xhci_ring_free(xhci, dbc->ring_out);
xhci_ring_free(xhci, dbc->ring_in);
xhci_ring_free(xhci, dbc->ring_evt);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-23 14:45 [PATCH 00/27] xhci features for usb-next Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 01/27] xhci: Make debug message consistent with bus and port number Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 02/27] xhci: dbc: Don't use generic xhci inc_deq() function for dbc Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 03/27] xhci: Don't pass struct xhci_hcd pointer to xhci_link_seg() Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 05/27] xhci: dbc: Remove dbc_dma_alloc_coherent() wrapper Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 06/27] xhci: dbc: Remove dbc_dma_free_coherent() wrapper Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 07/27] xhci: dbc: Add device pointer to dbc structure Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 08/27] xhci: dbc: Use dev_info() and similar instead of xhci_info() Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 09/27] xhci: dbc: Don't use xhci_write_64() as it takes xhci as a parameter Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 10/27] xhci: dbc: Don't pass the xhci pointer as a parameter to xhci_dbc_init_context() Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 11/27] xhci: dbc: Get the device pointer from dbc structure in dbc_ep_do_queue() Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 12/27] xhci: dbc: Pass dbc pointer to endpoint init and exit functions Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 13/27] xhci: dbc: Change to pass dbc pointer to xhci_do_dbc_stop() Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 14/27] xhci: dbc: Pass dbc pointer to dbc_handle_xfer_event() instead of xhci_hcd pointer Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 15/27] xhci: dbgtty: Pass dbc pointer when registering a dbctty device Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 16/27] xhci: dbc: Pass dbc pointer to get_in/out_ep() helper functions to get endpoints Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 17/27] xhci: dbc: Use dbc structure in the request completion instead of xhci_hcd Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 18/27] xhci: dbc: Don't use generic xhci context allocation for dbc Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 19/27] xhci: dbc: don't use generic xhci ring allocation functions " Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 20/27] xhci: dbc: Pass dbc pointer to dbc memory init and cleanup functions Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 21/27] xhci: dbc: Pass dbc pointer to dbc start and stop functions Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 22/27] xhci: dbc: simplify dbc requests allocation and queueing Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 23/27] xhci: dbc: remove endpoint pointers from dbc_port structure Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 24/27] xhci: dbctty: split dbc tty driver registration and unregistration functions Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 25/27] xhci: dbc: Add a operations structure to access driver functions Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 26/27] xhci: dbgcap: remove dbc dependency on dbctty specific flag Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 27/27] xhci: dbc: remove tty specific port structure from struct xhci_dbc Mathias Nyman
2020-07-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 00/27] xhci features for usb-next Greg KH
2020-07-23 18:47 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-07-24 7:06 ` Greg KH
2020-07-24 11:11 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-07-24 16:32 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200723144530.9992-5-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).