From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Muchowski, MaciejX" <maciejx.muchowski@intel.com>,
"Paczynski, Lukasz" <lukasz.paczynski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: Introduce max wait timeout in xhci_handshake()
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:36:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216043641.GA15845@chenyu-office.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X9i8grY9BRbbCqNZ@kroah.com>
Hi Greg,
thanks for taking a look at this.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:39:14PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:22:40PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > The time to finish a xhci_handshake() is platform specific
> > and sometimes during suspend resume test the followng
> > errors were encountered:
> > [53455.418330] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S4
> > [66838.490856] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: xHCI dying, ignoring interrupt.
> > Shouldn't IRQs be disabled?
> > After changing the poll time granularity from 1 usec to 20 usec in
> > xhci_handshake() this issue was not reproduced. While tuning on the
> > poll time granularity might be painful on different platforms, it is
> > applicable to introduce a module parameter to allow the xhci driver to wait
> > for at max 16 ms.
> >
> > Reported-by: "Muchowski, MaciejX" <maciejx.muchowski@intel.com>
>
> I doubt the "X" is part of this person's name, please just spell it out
> without the "," please.
>
Okay, will do.
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > index d4a8d0efbbc4..b8be9f3cc987 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ static unsigned long long quirks;
> > module_param(quirks, ullong, S_IRUGO);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(quirks, "Bit flags for quirks to be enabled as default");
> >
> > +static int wait_handshake;
> > +module_param(wait_handshake, int, 0644);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(wait_handshake, "Force wait for completion of handshake");
>
> This is not the 1990's, we are not adding new module parameters that no
> one will know how to change.
>
Okay.
> Make this dynamic, and per-device, and work properly instead. This can
> not handle multiple controllers in the system at all :(
>
Okay. After checking the error log, enlarging the timeout might not be enough
and I'll dig into it a little deeper and send feedback.
thanks,
Chenyu
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-16 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-15 13:22 [PATCH] xhci: Introduce max wait timeout in xhci_handshake() Chen Yu
2020-12-15 13:39 ` Greg KH
2020-12-16 4:36 ` Chen Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201216043641.GA15845@chenyu-office.sh.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.paczynski@intel.com \
--cc=maciejx.muchowski@intel.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox