From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
m.v.b@runbox.com, hadess@hadess.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] USB: Don't set USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND on WD19's Realtek Hub
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:46:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210415184637.GA15445@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABTNMG0MuaSkWZhiTwtWjPTg5WZ-Vdt9Ju9-RzBke9JjCBJo8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:13:43AM +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
> One thing worth mentioning here, I never hit the hub_ext_port_status -71
> problem if I resume by waking up from the keyboard connected to the hub.
I thought you said earlier that the port got into trouble while it was
suspending, not while it was resuming. You wrote:
> [ 2789.679812] usb 3-4-port3: can't suspend, status -110
So if the problem occurs during suspend, how can it be possible to avoid
the problem by taking some particular action later while resuming?
> But the usbcore kernel log shows me wPortStatus: 0503 wPortChane: 0004
> of that port while resuming. In normal cases, they are 0507:0000.
The 0004 bit of wPortChange means that the suspend status has changed;
the port is no longer suspended because the device attached to that port
(your keyboard) issued a wakeup request.
> I don't know how to SetPortFeature() with setting the status change bit only.
You can't. Only the hub itself can set the wPortChange bits.
> Or maybe it's just some kind of timing issue of the
> idle/suspend/resume signaling.
Not timing. It's because you woke the system up from the attached
keyboard.
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-15 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 11:48 [PATCH v3] USB: Don't set USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND on WD19's Realtek Hub chris.chiu
2021-04-15 12:31 ` Greg KH
2021-04-15 16:13 ` Chris Chiu
2021-04-15 18:46 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2021-04-16 1:24 ` Chris Chiu
2021-04-16 15:39 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-19 5:11 ` Chris Chiu
2021-04-19 14:19 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-20 7:14 ` Chris Chiu
2021-04-20 15:28 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-20 16:54 ` Chris Chiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210415184637.GA15445@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=chris.chiu@canonical.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.v.b@runbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox