From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430E2C433B4 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1879E611BF for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343696AbhDPPaP (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:30:15 -0400 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:54199 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1343665AbhDPPaO (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:30:14 -0400 Received: (qmail 44011 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Apr 2021 11:29:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:29:49 -0400 From: Alan Stern To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzbot , Andrey Konovalov , Felipe Balbi , Dan Carpenter , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , USB list , syzkaller-bugs , syzkaller Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in gadget_setup Message-ID: <20210416152949.GC42403@rowland.harvard.edu> References: <00000000000075c58405bfd6228c@google.com> <20210413161311.GC1454681@rowland.harvard.edu> <20210413165724.GD1454681@rowland.harvard.edu> <20210415205957.GA19917@rowland.harvard.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:21:12AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:59 PM Alan Stern wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 07:11:11PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > Yes, this is possible: > > > http://bit.do/syzbot#syzkaller-reproducers > > > > That's not really what I had in mind. I don't want to spend the time > > and effort installing syskaller on my own system; I want to tell syzbot > > to run a particular syzkaller program (the one that originally led to > > this bug report) on a patched kernel. > > > > The syzbot instructions say that it can test bugs with reproducers. The > > problem here is that there doesn't seem to be any way to tell it to use > > a particular syzkaller program as a reproducer. > > Hi Alan, > > This makes sense and I've found an existing feature request: > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/1611 > I've added a reference to this thread there. Great! Thank you. Alan Stern